Video Codec Explanation

Free Download Mp4Gain

Video Codec Explanation

Video codecs, or compression-decompression algorithms, are the unsung heroes behind the videos we watch daily. They work like digital magicians, making it possible to store and transmit videos efficiently while preserving image quality. To understand them better, think of video codecs as puzzle masters.

Imagine you have a jigsaw puzzle of a beautiful landscape. However, you need to fit it into a smaller box for storage or mailing. A video codec is like an expert puzzle solver; it disassembles the image into smaller pieces, discards unnecessary ones (compression), and records the steps needed to put it all back together (encoding). When you want to enjoy the landscape again, the video codec reassembles it, like completing the puzzle.

Video codecs come in various types, each with its strengths. Some prioritize smaller file sizes for streaming, while others focus on maintaining pristine quality for high-definition content. Understanding these differences helps you select the right codec for your specific needs.

What Are the Best Video Codecs for Streaming?

When it comes to streaming video content over the internet, the choice of video codec plays a significant role in ensuring a smooth and enjoyable viewing experience. Two popular video codecs for streaming are H.264 and H.265 (also known as HEVC).

H.264, also known as AVC (Advanced Video Coding), has been a long-standing favorite for online streaming platforms. It offers a good balance between video quality and compression efficiency, making it suitable for a wide range of devices and network conditions. It’s like the reliable family car that gets you where you need to go comfortably and without fuss.

On the other hand, H.265, or HEVC (High-Efficiency Video Coding), is like the fuel-efficient hybrid car of the video codec world. It provides superior compression, resulting in smaller file sizes without compromising quality. This makes it an excellent choice for streaming 4K and even 8K video content, where bandwidth is a concern.

As someone deeply immersed in the world of video codecs, I’ve witnessed firsthand how the right codec choice can transform the streaming experience. It’s not just about technicalities; it’s about delivering content that captivates the audience while optimizing resources.

Free Download Mp4Gain

Mp4Gain Main Window

Mp4Gain Features

Free Download Mp4Gain

Video Codec Profiles and Levels: A Guide for Video Creators

When you’re creating a video, one of the most important decisions you’ll make is the video codec you’ll use. The codec will determine the quality and size of your video, as well as the compatibility with different devices.

Video codecs are divided into profiles and levels. Profiles define the features that are supported by a codec, while levels define the maximum quality and size of a video encoded with that profile.

What are Video Codec Profiles?

Video codec profiles define the features that are supported by a codec. This includes things like the type of frames that are supported, the resolution of the video, and the chroma subsampling.

There are a number of different video codec profiles available, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Some of the most common profiles include:

Main Profile: This is the most common profile and is supported by most devices. It supports a wide range of resolutions and chroma subsamplings.
High Profile: This profile offers higher quality than the Main Profile, but it is not supported by as many devices.
High 10 Profile: This profile supports 10-bit color, which can provide even higher quality than the High Profile.

What are Video Codec Levels?

Video codec levels define the maximum quality and size of a video encoded with a particular profile. This is determined by factors such as the maximum bitrate and the maximum frame rate.

There are a number of different video codec levels available, each with its own quality and size requirements. Some of the most common levels include:

Level 3: This is the lowest level and supports a maximum bitrate of 10,000 kbps.
Level 4: This level supports a maximum bitrate of 20,000 kbps.
Level 5: This level supports a maximum bitrate of 40,000 kbps.
**

Choosing the Right Profile and Level

The best way to choose the right profile and level for your video depends on a number of factors, including:

The desired quality of the video.
The target audience.
The devices that the video will be played on.
If you’re creating a video for a wide audience, then you’ll want to choose a profile and level that is supported by most devices. If you’re creating a video for a specific audience, then you may be able to choose a higher quality profile and level.

Final Words about Video Codec Profiles and Levels

Video codec profiles and levels are an important part of video encoding. By understanding the different profiles and levels, you can choose the right settings for your video, ensuring that it is both high quality and compatible with the devices that you want to play it on.

I hope this article has helped you to understand video codec profiles and levels.

Video Codec Comparison: Technical analysis of popular codecs

Video Codec

Comparing Video Codecs: In-depth Look

When I first started working with video, I was confused by all the different codecs out there. It’s essential to understand the technical aspects of each codec to make informed decisions. In this section, we’ll dive deep into the world of video codecs and compare their performance, compression efficiency, and compatibility.
One of my favorite quotes from the movie “The Social Network” is, “The internet is not written in pencil, it’s written in ink.” This quote reminds me of the importance of choosing the right codec for your video projects. A poor codec choice can lead to compatibility issues and poor video quality.
I’ve had my fair share of experiences with various codecs, and I’ve learned that it’s crucial to consider factors like bitrate, frame rate, and resolution when comparing codecs. These factors can significantly impact the final video quality and playback performance.

Analyzing Top Video Codecs: A Technical Perspective

In my experience, some of the most popular video codecs include H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, and AV1. Each codec has its strengths and weaknesses, and understanding these differences can help you choose the best codec for your project.
H.264 is widely supported and offers good compression efficiency, making it a solid choice for most applications. However, it may struggle with high-resolution content and require higher bitrates to maintain quality.
On the other hand, H.265 (HEVC) provides better compression efficiency than H.264, especially for high-resolution content. But it’s not as widely supported and may require more processing power for playback.
VP9 is an open-source codec developed by Google, offering similar compression efficiency to H.265. It’s well-suited for web streaming but may not be as widely supported as H.264.
Lastly, AV1 is a newer open-source codec that promises even better compression efficiency than H.265 and VP9. However, it’s still in the early stages of adoption and may not be supported by all devices and platforms.

Video Codec Showdown: A Technical Breakdown

When comparing video codecs, it’s essential to consider factors like compression efficiency, playback performance, and compatibility. In my experience, I’ve found that newer codecs like H.265 and AV1 offer better compression efficiency, which can result in smaller file sizes and lower bandwidth requirements.
However, these newer codecs may require more processing power for playback, which can be a concern for older devices or slower internet connections. Additionally, compatibility can be an issue, as not all devices and platforms support the latest codecs.
In the end, it’s crucial to weigh the pros and cons of each codec and consider your specific needs and target audience. For example, if compatibility is a top priority, H.264 may be the best choice, while H.265 or AV1 might be more suitable for high-resolution content or bandwidth-limited scenarios.

Final Words

Choosing the right video codec can be a daunting task, but understanding the technical aspects of each codec can help you make an informed decision. In my experience, it’s essential to consider factors like compression efficiency, playback performance, and compatibility when comparing codecs.
If you’re looking for a tool to help you with video conversion and normalization, I recommend checking out mp4gain. It’s not free or open-source, but it’s a powerful solution for working with various audio and video formats, including an integrated equalizer. It runs on Windows and can be a valuable tool for managing your video projects.

Video Codecs: H.264, H.265, and VP9

The Importance of Choosing the Right Video Codec

Video Codecs: H.264, H.265, and VP9

As the world becomes increasingly digitized, the importance of video codecs in our lives cannot be overstated. Video codecs are essential in video compression, encoding, streaming, and playback. Choosing the right codec can make the difference between smooth playback and frustrating buffering, between crisp and clear images and pixelated messes. In this article, we will explore the differences between three of the most popular video codecs in use today: H.264, H.265, and VP9.

H.264 vs H.265: What’s the Difference?

H.264, also known as AVC (Advanced Video Coding), has been the dominant codec in use for the past decade. It is widely supported by devices and software and offers good compression while maintaining high video quality. However, H.265 (HEVC) is slowly taking over. It is a newer and more advanced codec that offers better compression ratios, which means smaller file sizes with the same quality as H.264. H.265 is also better at handling high-resolution videos, making it a good choice for 4K and 8K videos. However, it requires more processing power to decode, which may be an issue on older devices.

Personally, I have found that H.265 delivers noticeably better quality than H.264 for the same file size. It is especially noticeable in high-motion scenes like action movies or sports. However, it does require more processing power, so make sure your device can handle it before choosing it as your preferred codec.

VP9: The New Kid on the Block

VP9 is a newer codec developed by Google and is designed to be a royalty-free alternative to H.265. It offers better compression than H.264 while maintaining the same video quality. It is also highly efficient at handling high-resolution videos, making it a good choice for 4K and 8K videos. However, its adoption has been slow due to its lack of support in many devices and software. It also requires more processing power to decode than H.264.

One of my personal experiences with VP9 was when I was trying to stream a 4K video on my laptop. I noticed that the video was buffering a lot and the quality was not as good as I expected. After some research, I found out that the video was encoded with VP9, which my laptop did not support. I had to switch to H.264 to get smooth playback.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Video Codec

Choosing the right video codec is crucial for ensuring smooth video playback and high video quality. H.264 is still a solid choice for most situations, but H.265 and VP9 offer better compression and handling of high-resolution videos. However, they require more processing power and may not be supported by all devices and software. Make sure to choose the codec that best suits your needs and device capabilities.

In conclusion, video codecs are an essential part of our digital lives, and choosing the right one can make all the difference in our video-watching experience. Always keep in mind the pros and cons of each codec and make an informed decision based on your needs.

The Importance of Codecs in Video Compression

Video Codec

Introduction

Video Codec

Video codecs play a vital role in video compression. The quality and size of video files depend largely on the type of codec used to compress them. In this article, we will explore the significance of video codecs in video compression and the technical aspects that determine the quality and efficiency of video files.

History of Video Codecs

The first video codec was developed in the 1970s, called H.120. This codec allowed for the transmission of video over ISDN telephone lines. Since then, video codecs have evolved significantly, and we now have a wide range of codecs available that offer different levels of compression and quality.

Understanding Video Quality

Video quality can be defined as the degree of excellence that a video possesses. This quality is determined by various factors, including the resolution, bit rate, frame rate, and compression method used.

Resolution

The resolution of a video is the number of pixels that make up the image. Higher resolution videos have more pixels, which means they are sharper and more detailed. The most common resolutions are 720p, 1080p, and 4K.

Bit Rate

The bit rate is the amount of data that is processed per second. A higher bit rate means more data is processed, resulting in a higher-quality video. However, higher bit rates also mean larger file sizes, which can be challenging for storage and transmission.

Frame Rate

The frame rate is the number of frames that are displayed per second. A higher frame rate results in a smoother video, but it also requires more data to be processed, resulting in larger file sizes.

Compression Method

Compression methods are used to reduce the size of video files without compromising on quality. Lossless compression methods preserve the original quality of the video, while lossy compression methods sacrifice some quality to achieve smaller file sizes.

Video Codecs and Formats

Video codecs can be classified into two categories: proprietary codecs and open-source codecs. Proprietary codecs are developed by companies and are generally licensed for use. Open-source codecs, on the other hand, are developed by communities and are free to use.

Proprietary Codecs

Proprietary codecs are developed by companies such as Apple, Microsoft, and Google. They are often used in popular video formats such as MP4, AVI, and MOV. These codecs are optimized for specific devices and software, resulting in high-quality videos that are compatible with a wide range of devices.

Open-Source Codecs

Open-source codecs are developed by communities and are free to use. The most popular open-source codec is the VP9 codec developed by Google. It is used in the WebM format and offers a high level of compression with minimal loss of quality.

Choosing the Right Codec

When choosing a codec, it is important to consider the factors that affect video quality, such as resolution, bit rate, frame rate, and compression method. Proprietary codecs are often optimized for specific devices and software, while open-source codecs offer more flexibility and are free to use.

Format

The format of a video file also plays a significant role in determining the quality and efficiency of the file. Popular video formats include MP4, AVI, MOV, and WebM. Each format has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, and it is important to choose the right format based on your needs.

Conclusion

Video codecs are an essential part of video compression, and they play a significant role in determining the quality and size of video files. By understanding the technical aspects of video quality and the different types of codecs and formats available, you can make informed decisions when choosing

What is a video codec?

video codec

A codec is a program or device that encodes and decodes video. This means that it takes a video and compresses it into a smaller format so it can be streamed or stored more efficiently. Then, when you want to watch the video, the codec decodes it and plays it in its original format.

video codec

Why is a video codec important?

Video codecs are important because they make videos more accessible and easier to use. Without a codec, the videos would be too large to stream or store, which would mean that we would have to wait a long time to watch them or have a very large storage space to save them.

In addition, the codecs also make the videos look better. Some codecs use advanced techniques to compress the video without affecting its quality. This means that we can see sharp and clear videos, even when they are compressed to a smaller size.

Codecs are also important because they allow videos to be compatible with different devices and platforms. For example, if a video is encoded with a specific codec, it can be viewed on a computer, smartphone, smart TV, or game console without any problem.

What types of video codecs are there?

There are many different types of video codecs, but some of the most common are H.264, H.265, VP9, and AV1. Each codec has its own advantages and disadvantages, and some are better for certain uses than others.

For example, H.264 is a very popular codec used to compress high-definition video. It is a good option for most users as it is compatible with most devices and platforms. However, H.265 is a newer codec that is more efficient in terms of bandwidth and can offer improved video quality.

VP9 is an open source codec developed by Google that is used on some devices and platforms. AV1 is an open source codec developed by a coalition of technology companies and is a promising option for the future, offering more efficient compression and improved video quality.

It is important to note that not all codecs are created equal and some may require more processing power or bandwidth to function properly. Therefore, it is important to choose the correct codec for each situation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a video codec is an essential program or device that allows you to compress and decode videos to make them more accessible and compatible. There are many different types of video codecs available, and it’s important to choose the one that’s best for each situation. Mp4Gain is an excellent solution for those looking to optimize and enhance their video experience.

Comparison of video encoding with H.264 and H.265 codec

Comparison of video encoding with H.264 and H.265 codec

H.265 VS H.264

I would like to draw the attention of readers to the fact that I will carry out my story about the H.265 codec only from the point of view of how it can be used to create video movies, regardless of use in other areas. , for example, in video surveillance – everything is completely different there. I will start with the technical definition of the H.264 and H.265 codecs.

H.264 vs H.265

H.264 codec: scientifically it is called MPEG-4 part 10 or AVC (Advanced Video Coding). It appeared in 2003, but in everyday life they began to use it far from immediate, approximately since people began to buy high-definition video cameras. In my opinion today it is the only codec you want to compress video, it just has no competitors. Except, of course, 265.

H.265 or HEVC codec (High Efficiency Video Coding – High Efficiency Video Coding). Frame formats up to 8K (UHDTV) with a resolution of 8192 × 4320 pixels are supported. Manufacturers officially announced this codec in 2012. It was first used in IP broadcast systems. Then when 4K and 8K formats appeared and started to be widely used, for which H.264 was no longer ideal, the fifth one was useful there too.

But Н.265 is not a new product, it is, in fact, an improved 264. Initially, the creators were tasked with halving the bitrate with the same quality. If this task had been completed, then it would be possible, using H.265, to have a computer with half the power, or to receive the final file twice as easy, with the same quality. But this is only in theory.

You probably know that not all pixels in the image are affected during encoding; The image is divided into blocks according to the content. And the main difference between these two codecs is that they form these blocks differently. In other words, they divide the image into a different number of fragments. H.265 includes more pixels in each block, that is, the image is divided into fewer parts.

The first thought that occurs to a normal person is what he is like, because this will only make the quality worse! After all, if there was only one pixel in each block, which was compressed with individual parameters, then the image would be much better. This, of course, is true, but the reality is that, unfortunately, in our time the concept of quality for manufacturers of something fades into the background.

Based on information received from other operators, it can be assumed that when encoding the 4K format with a low bit rate, the advantage of H.265 is more noticeable than when using the Full HD format. But I don’t work with a low bit rate, high quality is important to me.

H.264 or H.265. What is better?

Everyone knows that the higher the quality you want to achieve, the more time and effort it takes. The same goes for encoding. If we assume that H.265 encodes better, it means that more time will be spent on encoding compared to H.264. But 30 times is excessive! I’m sure at 100 percent motion picture, it’s almost impossible to tell the difference that can be seen in the freeze frame, but then why complicate things using the 265? Although, here everyone decides for themselves what is more important to him: code as soon as possible and get a finished product, or wait longer, but evaluate a higher result.

The exact encoding time depends on how you record the video, how many small details there are, movement, what frame size, what is the power of your computer. Based on my observations, when encoding H.265, the computer uses much more resources, but the process itself is more adapted for multi-core processors, that is, the computer runs more smoothly.

I also tried encoding H.265 in maximum quality Full HD video, 50 frames per second for about 10 minutes. And when Media Encoder, which in principle encodes faster than Premier, reported that encoding would take more than 300 hours, I realized that it would take almost two weeks not to turn off the computer, and this is for 10 minutes. And my computer is quite powerful. When encoding 265 with a quality profile of “good”, the elapsed time is the same as the 264 setting in the image, but the difference is so insignificant that there is no point in uploading these screenshots.

The H.265 codec was created a long time ago and the question arises why it is not as popular as the developers planned. To the best of my knowledge, I can assume that firstly there is no such clearly visible advantage in video editing, and secondly, the development of using H.265 is hampered by the fact that you have to pay for its use in all devices where it is present.

Lossless video compression

Lossless video compression

Lossless video

In mid-November of last year, I was struck by the news from AlparySoft R&D Company about the launch of a codec developed by it to work with video. And although there are many codecs now, Lossless Video Codec still has one distinctive feature – these are the algorithms used that allow you to compress a video signal without mathematical loss. That is, after the encode-decode process, the source and the final video will be absolutely identical, and the original video is compressed 2 to 5 times.

Lossless

And so, last Saturday (May 15), Lossless Video Codec 2.0 was released. An important innovation was the addition of a lossless compression algorithm, that is, compression in which the human eye cannot differentiate between the original and processed video. The compression ratio here, for obvious reasons, is higher and amounts to 5-15 times.

I managed to learn the details about the new product with the help of Elena, the company’s public relations manager.

– What difficulties did you face when developing lossless compression algorithms?

– As with all other algorithms for processing and analyzing large amounts of data (either by filtering or eliminating data redundancy), there is the problem of choosing between compression quality and performance.

Obviously, the more time you can spend analyzing the data (in our case, it’s a frame from a movie), the better it can be compressed. On the other hand, we are faced with the task of compressing the stream of frames in real time (that is, 25-30 frames per second). Low-level optimization of its individual parts plays an important role in the development process of a program, which, although it is a laborious process, can significantly increase the speed of algorithms.

– Okay, but what does Lossless Video Codec look like in the context of similar products and in particular DivX?

– Compared to similar products, our codec looks pretty decent. For example, the tests and the results of the comparison with the well-known HuffYUV codec can be viewed on our website (www.alparysoft.ru/prod/compression/compress-compare.php).

Comparison with DivX would be wrong as there are several fundamental differences. First, DivX is a lossy codec; In any case, during compression, some information is lost, while in our codec, as noted above, lossless compression algorithms are presented. Second, our codec does not use video information from previous frames to compress a frame, because of this, videos compressed by our codec can be much easier to use for editing in various video editing programs.

– Elena, how long has your team been working on Alparysoft Lossless Video Codec?

– Work on the codec takes just over a year. Three developers participate in it.

– How popular is the codec developed today?

– According to statistics, there were several thousand downloads from the Russian Alparysoft website alone. But our codec is hosted on many sites, mostly foreign. Among them, there are such popular resources dedicated directly to video processing as Dvdrhelp.com and Doom9.com; here we constantly post updates to our programs.

Of course, there are comments and wishes, and advice and criticism from the users of our programs, as the site has a forum: any user can express his opinion about Alparysoft products. I do not pretend to say that absolutely all reviews are positive, but on the other hand, competent criticism and professional advice is always the force that helps to advance, improve, taking into account the requirements of consumers of rapidly developing technologies.

– From what I understand, the codec is free at this stage of development …

– Yes indeed, Alparysoft Lossless Video Codec is a free product and you just need to register online to get started. We took that step to popularize the products and technologies developed.

Video Formats: Everything You Should Know

There is currently a wide variety of video formats available to store multimedia content in a file and play it on our devices. Depending on this format (and other multiple factors) the video will basically have a different video quality and a smaller or smaller file size.

However, if you are not up to date on these issues, you may get lost since we enter concepts such as formats, codecs, containers or related terminology such as AVI, MP3, MP4, DIVX, XVID, OGG, MKV, OGG , FLV, MPG, VP9, HEVC, AAC, H.264, AVC and much more.

Guide to convert video formats

In this brief but detailed guide, our objective will be to explain the difference between all these concepts, often confusing, clearly separating terms such as “container video format” and “video codec”, in addition to learning along the way a simple and practical way of Convert videos to different formats.

Outline of a container format

To begin, we must be clear about the difference between these two concepts that are often confused very often: the container format and the video codec. The first one is really the format of the file, the one that surrounds everything (audio, video, etc …), while the second is the format directly related to the video part:

Container format

But let’s see a description of each concept to make it even clearer:

Container format: A video file usually has a specific container format, such as AVI, MP4 or MKV, for example. As the name implies, a file with this format contains several elements (usually and at least, video and audio). However, it is possible that it only includes one of them, or for example multiple audio channels (to have several languages of the same file). Some container formats also allow you to include other elements such as images or integrated subtitles, without the need for external files.

Video codec: It is often confused with the video format, but it really is not the same, since it is related to the video content and not to the container format. It is not a mandatory element, since if a codec is not specified, the video is contained in RAW (uncompressed), taking up a lot of space (for example, 200MB about 10sec). For that reason, a codec is usually chosen to compress the video. Depending on the codec’s choice, better or worse quality will be achieved, and in turn, larger or smaller.

Video specification: Each video codec is usually based on a specific video specification (H.262, H.263, H.264 …), which is nothing more than a set of rules that define how it should behave. This can guide us to know if one codec is more or less recent than another.

Audio codec: In the same way as with the video, we have possible audio channels included in the file. They are also usually compressed with a certain codec to save space: MP3, OGG Vorbis, WMA …

Once this is clear, we will review the most popular container formats and the video codecs that they usually use (this does not imply that they cannot also be used in other container formats):

AVI format (Microsoft, 1992)

Perhaps, in all likelihood, one of the best known container formats is the AVI (Audio video interleave). It was developed by Microsoft in 1992 and is one of the most popular formats, perhaps because of its wide use on Windows platforms. Being one of the first container formats it is the most basic and only allows audio and video channels (although multiple of them can be included, if desired).

If we focus on video codecs, the AVI format accepts almost any VFW-compatible codec, but the most commonly used are the well-known DivX or XviD (which is a bifronte of the previous one).

DivX codec

DivX became popular in version 3.11 and was nothing more than a modified version of a Microsoft codec. Subsequently, and due to its success, they rewrote the code so as not to violate Microsoft patents. However, the DivX project became proprietary, generating a tremendous difference of ideas and causing the birth of a free brother codec: XviD.

Related to DivX was the Stage6 platform which was a kind of YouTube that allowed uploading high quality videos for the time. However, it did not have the necessary financing and failed economically.

XviD codec

XviD became popular as a result of the detriment DivX experienced, surpassing it due to its good quality, efficiency and its open source character. In addition, it also began to be supported on a large number of homemade DVD players, where perhaps, one of the first that stood out was the KISS DP-450.

Although there are currently technically better codecs, XviD is still updated and is still used due to its popularity, compression speed and good performance.

MKV format (Matroska, 2002)

MKV format (Matroska)
MKV format (Matroska)
Matroska, better known by MKV, the extension used in its archives, is an open-source container format that bases its name on the classic Russian Matrioskas dolls that fit inside each other. In addition to the MKV extension (used for video, audio and possible subtitles), there are other extensions used such as MKA (audio only), MKS (subtitles only) or MK3D (3-dimensional video).

Codec x264

This format usually uses some H.264 implementation (codec specification) as a video codec, such as x264. On the other hand, for the audio section you usually use the Vorbis audio codec.

WebM format (Google, 2010)

One of the most recent container formats is WebM (WebMovie), a project slightly based on Matroska. Initially it was developed by the company On2 Technologies, but in 2010 it was purchased by Google, which released the project as a source code, orienting it to the objective of using it with HTML5 as a free standard.

The format has excellent performance and, together with the VP9 codec, make it a very interesting option that seems to have a lot of future.

VP9 codec

The video codec used by WebM is known by VP8, developed by the company On2 Technologies (after a long evolution from TrueMotion S, used in games like Final Fantasy VII). Originally, WebM used VP8 video codec alongside Vorbis audio codec, however, it currently uses VP9 video codec alongside Opus audio codec.

URL | VP9

MPG format (ISO, 1993/1995)

Probably, MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 are one of the most complex concepts to understand. First of all, it must be made clear that these are specifications, and not a format in itself, so each specification is made up of several different concepts:

MPEG-1 / MPEG-2 specification
MPEG-1 / MPEG-2 specification
MPEG-1 Specification (ISO, 1993)

The first one, MPEG-1, is the one used to define the first container format (MPEG-PS) and the VCD storage format (VideoCD, based on H.261). Subsequently, some modifications compatible with VCD that used MPEG-2, such as SVCD (SuperVCD) or KVCD, would also appear.

As a curiosity, mention that contrary to what many people believe, the famous MP3 audio files are not MPEG-3, but MPEG-1 and are defined in the third part of the specification.

MPEG-2 Specification (ISO, 1996)

The second specification, MPEG-2, is the one used to define the container formats (MPEG-PS / MPEG-TS) and the new DVD storage format (H.262). Some MP3 features were also improved and AAC (Advanced Audio Coding), an advanced audio format with numerous improvements over MP3, was introduced.