Mp3Gain Archives - mp4gain.com

Mp3Gain (2022)

Free Download Mp4Gain

Mp3Gain (2022) – Mp3Gain Windows 10 – 11

Mp3Gain Windows 11

Decades ago there was the so-called peak normalization, which in a simple way, measured the volume peaks of a recording and calculated how much they could be amplified before reaching distortion.

Then I used that “factor” of possible amplification and amplified the entire recording / song to increase the peaks. That is, all the songs had the peaks at the maximum possible level without distortion.

Mp4Gain, in addition to normalizing audio and video files, is a functional option today as we will see later.

Mp3Gain, based on a new method.

Later an algorithm emerged that calculated the perception
and not the spikes. This was used in Mp3Gain.
How did he achieve it? For example, based on the masking effect that says that two sounds that are close in time, if they have similar frequencies, it will happen that the first one masks the second, that is to say, this second one is redundant and is not heard by the human ear.

Mp3Gain, based on Replay Gain

All this set of theories and measurements are called “human perception” and then a file is measured in what perception it produces and it is calculated what modification a second or third file needs to sound with a similar perception.

This is saved in a tag in the file and so, when it is run, the music player program knows what amplification it should automatically give to make them sound at very similar levels.

Of course, we are giving a very simplified explanation, so that it is easily understood.

Today the different devices that play music read and follow the Replay Gain? Nope.

That is why it is no longer viable to use it as a normalization method.

Mp3Gain is no longer the ideal solution.

Mp4Gain is an alternative to Mp3Gain

Mp4Gain offers today the best normalization algorithm for audio and video.

Free Download Mp4Gain

Mp4Gain Main Window

Mp4Gain Features

Free Download Mp4Gain

Mp3Gain Windows 10

People are still wondering if there was a version of Mp3Gain for windows 10 and now there is Mp4Gain.

This new software offers the same functionality as Mp3Gain, but it is not limited to mps but normalizes the volume of the most popular audio formats.

Mp3Gain Windows 10 for video?

Mp4Gain is capable of normalizing the loudness of the most used video formats.

Of course you can use the Replay Gain if you wish, although Mp4Gain offers other methods that are more up-to-date and in accordance with THE DEVICES IN WHICH TODAY BOTH MUSIC AND VIDEO ARE REPRODUCED.

It can also extract the audio from a video by converting it to any audio format. That way if you have a video clip and you only want to have an mp3, flac, ogg, aac, etc. it is perfectly possible.

And of course it is perfectly compatible with Windows 10 and Windows 11 and with previous versions, especially Windows 7.

Normalize the volume of an mp3

For several decades, with the appearance of MP3, it has become a customary practice that people accumulate a large number of music files, mainly in MP3 format.
Some people get to accumulate thousands of songs in the MP3 format. which are easily transported with a pendrive using any other device, to be able to listen to them anywhere, and at any time.

This is very comfortable because one does not need to load any hard disk and much less large numbers of CDs or cassettes.
but it has the disadvantage here when mixing the songs that comes from very different recordings, times, etc. It occurs very frequently in volume level differences.
It is a typical problem today, want to Play favorite songs meets the fact that some sound much louder than others. And this eventually becomes a problem.

for this the volume normalizers have been created. The volume means all the songs have a volume as optimized as possible every possible level that each of them can play.
Volume normalizers have also existed for decades, and their algorithms to achieve amazing results. today download Mp4 Gain and check results no other software can offer. Russian other options How to change the pitch of a song Without altering its speed on the contrary modify the speed without affecting the Pitch. You can also equalize it and perform various functions that will be very useful.

Does bitrate influence? A 320 kbps Mp3 sounds better than a 128 kbps one?

Much has been speculated about the bitrate. Most people do not understand clearly what it is. A few understand, but almost nobody knows if a file with 320 kbps really sounds different or better than the same file but with 128 kbps.

The easiest way is to test:

The first is at 128 kbps

Now let’s hear the 320 kbps option

Notice the difference? In case the note is because it was encoded using the Mp4Gain.
Normally it is almost impercentible, but using a good encoder you get to notice some subtle difference.

It should be taken into account that at higher kbps, if there is a higher quality – although it is not always noticeable – and will always use more disk space.

Therefore it is not the best option to say “all my mp3s will be 320 kbps”, unless the space does not mean any problem at all.

Differences between Codec and container

Confusion between codec and container is very common. And even more if we add file extensions, such as .flv, .mp3, .mp4, etc.

What is a codec?

The codec term comes from the concatenation of the initials of two words: encoder and decoder. Strictly speaking, a codec is a specification on how to code a type of information and then be able to decode it. For example, a codec determines how video and audio information is compressed and decompressed. Remember that compression is a specific case of coding in which space is reduced, eliminating redundant or low perceptual impact information.

Coding means something like compressing. That is, it seeks to reduce the amount of bits that an audio file occupies. The idea is to reduce the amount of bits while maintaining the highest possible audio quality.

Obviously, once the files have been compressed, they need the counterpart, which becomes the decoder that is the one that can interpret and reconvert in sound what was written in the file.

Then, a codec is one that serves to compress and decompress (encode and decode) an audio or video file.

What is a container?

Within the multimedia scope, a container is a specification on how different types of encoded multimedia content are sorted within a file. These different contents are usually, mainly, video, audio and text.

Consider the case of a movie in digital format. This movie is in a file. When we open that file, a player runs and we can enjoy the movie. Notice that a movie has video, has audio, subtitles, information about its author, information about its duration, etc. For the convenience of the user, all these elements are grouped into a single file. The order in which they are saved in that file is the container specification.

Connection

The video information that is inside a container is usually compressed, that is, it usually follows the specification of a specific codec. The same goes for audio information. The confusion appears when there are containers and codecs with very similar or even equal names.

The most popular

The most popular video codecs currently are Theora, VP8, MPEG-2, h.264, Xvid and Divx. Regarding audio codecs: AAC, FLAC, MP3, Vorbis (ogg) and WMA are the most abundant.

The most commonly used containers are AVI, Divx, Matroska, Flash video, MP4, MPEG, Ogg, Quicktime, MXF and WebM. Since the containers are intrinsically linked to the files, each of them also specifies one or several possible file extensions:

AVI -> .avi
Divx -> .divx
Matroska -> .mkv, .mk3d, .mka, .mks
Flash video -> .flv, .f4v
MP4 -> .mp4
MPEG -> .mpg, .mpeg
Ogg -> .ogg
Quicktime -> .mov, .qt
MXF -> .mxf
WebM -> .webm

And to open a container and see its contents?

The containers are interpreted through a media player application, such as Windows Media Player, Quicktime (application with the same name as a container), VLC, Plex, RealPlayer or Winamp, to name a few .

A good option is the VLC player, as it offers compatibility with all formats under almost any platform and even allows you to play incomplete files (useful feature if you want to start playing an audiovisual content that has not yet finished downloading, provided that this be progressive). In addition, it is freely distributed.

Is the mp3 officially declared dead?

What audio formats govern in 2019?

At the end of last month, the Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS, a German organization specializing in the development of applications and technologies, announced that the Technicolor mp3 licensing program “for certain related mp3 patents and Technicolor and Fraunhofer IIS software has been finished”. In other words: the creator of the audio format that ruled the world at the end of the nineties and the beginning of the new century gave him, with these words, the last nail to the coffin of the mp3.

“We thank all our licensees for their great support in converting mp3 into the defacto audio format in the world, during the last two decades.”

The IIS recognizes that although there are currently more efficient audio codecs with advanced features, the mp3 is still very popular. However, most video and audio streaming services use “modern ISO-MPEG codecs such as the AAC family or in the future MPEG-H. Those can deliver more features and higher audio quality at much lower bitrates compared to mp3 ”.

The format was the protagonist of the change of the business model of the music industry, when digital technologies and the Internet began to facilitate the sharing of music. Buying a CD and compressing it in mp3 format to store the music on other media (recordable CDs, basically) and thus starting a process of hand-to-hand transmission of albums and discographies became daily bread (access to broadband and email capabilities at the end of the last century complicated making this diffusion through virtual media).

The AAC or Advanced Audio Coding is the format used in applications and services such as Apple Music and is capable of providing high quality audio without requiring large amounts of information. This algorithm exploits two strategies for this: it discards from the audio what is not perceptible to the human ear and eliminates the redundant signals in the coding (remember that this, like the mp3 and other streaming formats is a method of music compression, therefore it constitutes an interpretation of an audio originally edited in formats such as FLAC or Free Lossless Audio Codec, another digital compression format that, unlike its other pairs, does not register any loss in the quality of the compressed audio).

However, Spotify, the paid streaming service that reigns in the world with 100 million subscribers (although Soundcloud has a total of 175 million users), uses another format, the Ogg Vorbis (OGG), which in premium quality grants audios to 320 kbps (in the desktop version of the application, because in its mobile version they only reach half the quality).

Deezer, a competitor of Spotify, on the other hand, offers an Elite service, with audio streaming in FLAC format (16-bit, at 1,411 kbps) at twice the premium subscription of its rival.

As you can imagine, at better quality, larger files, mass consumption of memory and storage. Perhaps this was not the strength of the mp3: to offer a decent audio format, depending on the codec and the player, without requiring the use of too much information (although the flatness of its compression and the metallization of the organic sounds that the conversion to mp3 meant I had nothing lovely about it). Anyway, today is official: the king is dead, long live the king.

Everything you wanted to ask about the mp3

WHAT IS A CODEC AND WHAT IS IT FOR?

CODEC is an abbreviation of CODifier-DECodifier, which already indicates its functions. In the case of MP3, it deals with processing the sound, applying various compression methods to reduce the size necessary for its storage, and conversely, to reconstruct the sound from the encoded information. The codecs can be found in the form of an executable file, a DLL, or less frequently, incorporated into the code of another program. The DLL format allows the same codec to be easily used by different programs, while the executable format is usually more flexible in terms of configuration, although it is more complex to use.

WHAT DOES “PSYCHOCAUSTIC COMPRESSION” MEAN?

This very complicated word refers to the main compression technique that MP3 uses (although it is not the only one), which simply consists of eliminating the information (sound, in this case) that, in theory, is not able to perceive the ear human. I say “in theory” because, depending on the compression ratio that is applied, that loss may be more or less noticeable, hence some files do not sound as good as would be desired. The different codec also do not use psychoacoustic principles in the same way, so the quality they achieve will not be the same.

DOES THE SOURCE ORIGIN INFLUENCE THE MP3 QUALITY?

Evidently. The ideal is to start from an original CD. Analog sources, such as vinyl records or tapes, have lower quality in themselves, no matter how much we “digitize” or “improve” them with some programs. Recorded CDs may contain errors (which will end up being noises when played), and we usually do not know from which source they have been recorded (perhaps from previously encoded MP3 files). Re-encoding an already compressed music file, in the same or another format, is also a mistake, since quality is always lost.

DO THE PROGRAMS WE USE TO EXTRACT AND CODIFY THE QUALITY OF MP3?

It also seems obvious, so much so that this point should not be here. But many people do not take it into account, without knowing the reasons very well.

DOES THE QUALITY OF PLAYERS INCLUDE IN THE QUALITY OF MP3?

To hear it, you already know the answer, don’t you? J. To have it stored on the hard drive or on a CD, nope. Jokes aside, and in theory, all decoders should get the same sound from an MP3 file. But unfortunately this is not the case, usually because they do not strictly conform to the MP3 standard. You can find the best explanations on this topic here.

DOES THE QUALITY OF THE SOUND CARD AND SPEAKERS INCLUDE IN THE QUALITY OF THE MP3?

Well, I think you already know where the shots are going, we will not continue along this line. But nobody says “is that MP3 does not sound good” when it has a Sound Blaster 16 (what times those!) And some 800 W TurboPowerSound speakers that cost € 18 uros.

WHAT IS BITRATE?

It is the number of bits that are used to encode a second of sound, if we talk about MP3. It is measured in Kbps (kilobits per second).

As there is often confusion, we will give an example. If we have a 4-minute MP3 encoded at 128 Kbps:

-One second occupies: 128 Kbits x (1 Byte / 8 bits) = 16 KBytes.

-The complete song: 16 KBytes / second x (4 minutes x 60 seconds / 1 minute) = 3840 KBytes = 3.75 MBytes.

The formulas could be more correct, but this is not a mathematical thesis and I think they are enough to understand us.

WHAT DOES CBR, VBR and ABR MEANS, AND WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?

They are different coding methods. CBR means “Constant BitRate”, VBR “Variable BitRate” and ABR “Average BitRate”. It is easy to deduce that if CBR is used, the bitrate remains fixed, and if VBR is used, the bitrate changes. ABR can be considered a variant of VBR in which the objective is to achieve a certain final size, since we can set the average bitrate to be used (although it will never be as accurate as CBR).

The great advantage of VBR is that it uses more bits when the fragment to be encoded is more complex, and less when there are silences or it is simpler, so that we will achieve the highest quality using the minimum possible space. If the final size is not the deciding factor, it is the most recommended option.

WHAT IS THE BEST MP3 CODEC TO COMPRESS MUSIC? WHAT IS YOUR BEST CONFIGURATION?

The first question is easy to answer: LAME. In many different tests, done independently and with means that probably none of us will ever have, LAME is considered again and again as the best codec. And since there is no commercial motivation, since it is free distribution software, we can give full validity to these tests. The Fraunhofer codec and some of its “versions” could be valid in certain circumstances, but … do we need to use a commercial or pirate codec with a free and legal substitute? I think not (and from here, what each one does, is his own thing). For me, codec MP3 = LAME.

The second question is much harder to answer. There is no configuration that is perfect for everything (because if not, the modifiable options would be left over and everything would be much easier) J. But there are some recommended options in general, which we can establish with the assurance that the result will be of good quality. I have to admit that I barely change them, but as in this case (and in many others) there are no absolute truths, everyone has to try until they establish the one that best suits their preferences (or their ears).

The first thing that we must be clear about is that, in an MP3 file, size and quality are conflicting terms. We have to look for a practical middle ground. I put that term between 128 and 192 Kbps (some will say it is too low … I will try to justify my opinion). In principle, the purists established the CD quality at 256 kbps CBR. That is, using that bitrate, the sound of the CD and that of the MP3 file were absolutely indistinguishable. But, right now, LAME is already very developed. It uses the most advanced techniques, and manages to do perfectly things that other codecs are not able to solve properly (VBR, Joint-Stereo), which allows you to improve the quality and reduce the size.

In r3mix.net, after the corresponding tests, they have established an “ideal” configuration based on quality criteria. This configuration is so accepted, that in the latest versions of CDex, and other programs, it is already included as one of the preset configurations. But be careful: this does not mean that this is the only option, nor that it will always achieve the highest possible quality. Another thing is that using this option our ear can differentiate the results of the original audio CD, and this is where the “trick” of MP3 compression is.

After having used this configuration, I have observed that, although there are important variations, the average of the files is about 170-175 kbps, and that they rarely go beyond those 192 Kbps that I mentioned before, so I consider that overcoming that bitrate does not it will hardly improve the quality, but it will significantly increase the size. Although I repeat, there will always be someone to whom this bitrate seems insufficient, and will use even 320 Kbps, which is the maximum supported by LAME.

The second part is to take into account the equipment we have. If the MP3s are not going to sound through a card, an amplifier and very good quality speakers, the bitrate can be adjusted a little more without practically noticing variation in quality. The average 160 Kbps seems like a very reasonable amount to me, and that’s how I usually code my CDs. And I can say that they don’t sound bad at all. If someone is able to do a “blind” test and differentiate between several files encoded (correctly) at 160 and 192 Kbps, you really have to congratulate him on his ear.

Finally, if we consider size as a decisive factor, we could go down to 128 Kbps, but considering that the quality may already be too compromised. Summarizing:

Configuration that seems more appropriate for practical purposes, and looking for a high quality (about 192 Kbps):

-Joint-Stereo -> Get reduce the final size without losing quality. Sometimes, where there is a lot of variation between channels and with high bitrates, it could be configured as Stereo.

-VBR MTRH Quality 1 or R3Mix Preset -> Change the bitrrate according to the needs of each moment, improving the quality without increasing the size with respect to CBR (normally).

-Bitrate minimum 64 Kbps -> To compress to the maximum silences and very simple fragments.

-Bitrate maximum 256 Kbps -> So you have room to improve the quality in complicated fragments.

Youtube to mp3: convert from youtube video to mp3

Youtube to mp3

The whole world wants to be able to download music videos from YouTube and convert them into mp3.
The idea is quite simple, since in YouTube all the artits upload all their ideas and almost always with HD and high musical quality.

But the next thing would be to convert them from mp4 to mp3, but our software does that automatically. You only select the songs you want to download, even a playlist or a complete channel and the software downloads it and converts it into the format you want.

Convert YouTube to mp3 with just one click?

Yes, just choose the video, the playlist or the channel and it gives you “download2 and the program does everything without you having to do anything.

The graphic interface of the program is very beautiful and modern and works very well.

And the program gets it for free, as a gift, when you buy Mp4Gain.

Mp4Gain is a program that normalizes the audio volume of the main audio and video formats.

You can store thousands of mp3s downloaded from YouTube or store them in other formats such as flac, ogg, m4a, etc.

Today converting to mp3 from YouTube is very simple if you use our free program.

What is the difference between MP3 and FLAC

What is the problem with the popular MP3 or why FLAC is of better quality? Actually, in addition to these 2 formats, there are others with different specifications that differentiate them from each other.

In this article we will talk about the most important formats and their characteristics, in this way you can choose the one that suits you.

What is bitrate?

The difference in the size of the files is noticeable

You’ve probably heard this term before, but if you don’t remember it or don’t know what it means, I’ll explain it. Bitrate is translated as the bit rate, that is, the amount of bits or data that are processed in a unit of time. When referring to audio, we usually use the measurement of kilobits per second (Kbps). For example, the music available on iTunes is usually 256 Kbps, which means that there are 256 kilobits of information stored in every second of the song.

The higher the bitrate of a file, the more space it occupies on your hard drive. Usually, a music CD uses a large amount of memory space, so since the early 1990s, researcher Karlheinz Brandenburg developed the audio compression standard we now know as MP3. When an audio file is compressed, the space destined for it is smaller, however, this means that it loses part of its sound quality. For that reason, the different audio formats available are divided into 2 categories: with losses and without losses.

Lossless Formats

Lossless or lossless formats, as they are known in English, retain the sound quality of the original source intact. This means if you compress a CD in any of these formats, your digital music files will have the highest quality.

FLAC. Free Lossless Audio Codec is the most used sound codec, making it one of the best options for storing music without losing quality. Unlike other formats such as WAV and AIFF, the compression it uses decreases the space it occupies. In addition, it is free and free software, so anyone can use it and is compatible with a considerable number of players.
WAV and AIFF. These 2 formats do not use compression, so it could be said that they are exact copies of the original sound source. Although both are of the same quality, what differentiates them is the way they store the data. AIFF was created by Apple, while WAV is used universally. The problem with these formats is that since they do not have any compression, they take up too much memory space. They are normally used in audio editing.
A THE C. Apple’s lossless format is very similar to FLAC because it uses compression, the detail is that it was created by the company founded by Steve Jobs. Although its compression method is not as efficient as that of FLAC (it occupies more space), the advantage is that it is compatible with iTunes and iOS devices.
Formats with losses

Lossy, or lossy, formats are the most common, most systems and players recognize them and compress a lot, which allows large amounts of music to be stored in a small space. One advantage is that if your bitrate is high enough, it will be difficult to distinguish the difference you keep with the original source.

MP3 Its name without abbreviation is MPEG Audio Layer III, and it is the most popular lossy format, so much that it has become the benchmark in the category of digital or downloadable music on the Internet. Although it is not the most efficient format of all, it is the one with the highest compatibility, so it is the first option to choose between lossy formats.
AAC Advance Audio Coding is similar to MP3, although a bit more efficient in compression, which means that your files take up less space while matching the quality of the MP3. Although not as popular, it has the advantage that Apple players support it.
WMA As the name implies, Windows Media Audio is the proprietary format of Microsoft. It is very similar to the 2 previous formats and does not really offer any advantage over them. The disadvantage is that it is not so popular, so it is not compatible with many systems.

Which one should you use?

After having reviewed the main formats of both categories and their characteristics, we conclude that the type of file to use will depend on the habits and tastes of the user. In general, MP3 and AAC are widely recommended, because they are compatible with most players and the quality of both becomes quite good if it is encoded with a high enough bitrate (192 Kbps onwards). If your demands in audio quality are not the highest, any of these 2 formats is ideal thanks to the little space they occupy.

Storing your music collection in FLAC will require many GB of storage

However, storing music for posterity in MP3 or AAC may not be the best idea, since converting from one format with losses to another with losses will produce files with much lower quality. On the other hand, FLAC is the best for preserving music for the future, because it will keep the quality intact and allow converting to other formats in the future, in addition to occupying less space than WAV or AIFF.

If your interest is to enter the world of audiophilia, without a doubt lossless formats are the option. Thus, it is necessary to consider that to notice the difference between a high quality MP3 file and a FLAC, you must have high fidelity headphones or speakers and have a trained ear. Of course, the storage issue is also important, the amount of gigabytes or terabytes you will need to store all your music will depend on the size of your collection.

In conclusion, the format you intend to use will depend on your musical demands, both in quantity of music and in its quality. You just have to remember that the important factors are compatibility and avoid converting between 2 formats with loss and, above all, enjoy music in the way you like best.

WHAT IS THE BEST FORMAT TO LISTEN TO MUSIC?

There are many, but after trying almost all of them, here we tell you which is our preference for quality and file size.

As part of our new discovery, we want to share what our experience has been in the vast market of formats offered in digitalized music. The not so common OGG used by Spotify; the AAC incorporated by Apple Music and even the MP3 used by the Google Play Music and Amazon Music service. They all offer different qualities so you will undoubtedly notice a difference when listening to your favorite songs.

We could even include uncompressed formats such as FLAC, AIFF, or even DSD and WAV. Apparently superior qualities, since, if you are like us who do not have a specialized audio equipment for this purpose, it does not make much sense to bring a file of more than 50 MB on your sixth generation iPod with a capacity of 64Gb.

Removing that from the medium, this article we want to dedicate it exclusively to compressed formats in order to show the benefits and benefits of knowing how to choose the best of all. It is important because, taking it into account, it can also help you solve the dilemma of which streaming music service would suit you best.

3. MP3 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer III or MPEG-2 Audio Layer III)

Mp3 Starting with the most common of all, the MP3, a format that although we can give it the merit of being the first to emerge to digitize the music, it is not so in terms of quality. It is also true that its size makes it the best for allowing a song of five minutes occupying about 10 Mb on average of your internal memory of the cell phone and / or music player. However, its coding and the way in which it cuts digital information to be able to offer a small weight file is one of its clearest disadvantages.

In practice, this is reflected when you put a song like Angel de Massive Attack, where the bass is deep and in detail – that is, you have the “boom” caused by the lower frequencies, in addition to the pick of the strings of the low- you don’t enjoy generating artifacts that distort the signal.

For that reason, the MP3, German format founded with the idea of offering music in the first digital era of computers, is not the best there is in the market … By the way, not long ago it was announced that its creators declared it dead.

2. OGG Vorbis

Ogg was like the direct competition in its time, of MP3. Created by a programmer and vocational musician from the United States named Chris Montgomery, it is clear evidence that when your passion is combined with your work, the results are extraordinary.

Recalling a little the history of OGG to contextualize, it emerges in the nineties as a need to find a better way to encode and compress digitized information. And maybe that is one of the reasons why Spotify chooses this format to play and stream the music: friendly, versatile and small in size, it is definitely better than MP3.

The quality of the same role we mentioned earlier is far exceeded. Not only the bass frequencies sound better defined, but the media and the treble ones are balanced a little – so to speak – to offer better sharpness and detail of the instrumentation in general.

However, it is not the best there is in the market, since besides it is difficult to achieve, there is something that is lacking to be our first choice: we would say that, it is something like the “tone” of the sound.

1. AAC (Advanced Audio Coding)

aac is our first choice. With a sound coding that allows you to eliminate less information from an analog signal, the result is quite noticeable when you compare a song with this extension, with that of the other two formats. The bass sounds completely deep and defined without distorting anything, in addition to the medium and treble being highlighted allowing a wider dynamic range than the MP3 and OGG.

It is the holy grail of compressed music formats. We would even dare to say that the AAC offered by the iTunes Store and Apple Music is as good in quality as a FLAC or WAV. If you put one followed by the other, the only notable difference you can find is the amount of the volume. While an uncompressed format offers you more sound, that other format invented by the Fraunhofer Institute in conjunction with Sony, Dolby and AT&T, has slightly less volume, but with the same quality.

So, the AAC is the best format you can get: it has a fairly small file size; it has a “tone” of music that enhances all the details of the instrumentation and voice in the songs; and having even specializations by sound engineers at Apple to include in their record materials their “Masterized for iTunes” versions, there is no way to make a mistake when choosing it as our favorite.