Tag: aac file format

Comparison of AAC and MP3 compression


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture

Comparison of AAC and MP3 Compression

Comparison of AAC and MP3 compression

Let’s talk about AAC and MP3 compression

When I first began exploring audio compression, the difference between AAC and MP3 stood out as crucial. Both are popular, but AAC often feels like the more efficient option. It’s like comparing an old-school flip phone to a modern smartphone—they both work, but one offers so much more with the same resources. AAC provides higher sound quality at similar bitrates, which makes it a favorite for streaming services and high-quality playback.

MP3, however, has been around longer and is compatible with virtually every device. I’ve used MP3 files on ancient MP3 players that AAC wouldn’t even recognize. But as audio technology evolves, AAC is becoming the go-to choice for those who value efficiency and superior sound.

How does audio compression work?

Compression works by removing parts of the audio that most people won’t notice. Imagine you’re cleaning out your closet—you toss items you haven’t used in years, freeing up space without really losing anything important. That’s essentially what AAC and MP3 do with audio data. They strip out redundant or less noticeable sounds to shrink the file size.

MP3 uses an older algorithm, which means it’s like using a blunt tool. AAC, on the other hand, employs advanced techniques to preserve more detail. When I listen to an AAC file, I often catch subtle nuances like soft background harmonies that might disappear in an MP3 version.

Sound quality differences between AAC and MP3

When I compare AAC and MP3 at the same bitrate, AAC consistently sounds better. For example, at 128 kbps, AAC audio feels fuller and richer, while MP3 can sound flat or distorted. It’s like the difference between watching a high-definition video and a blurry old VHS tape—both convey the same message, but one does it with far more clarity.

In real-life situations, like playing music in my car or through my phone’s speakers, AAC handles compression artifacts better. MP3 files often introduce a noticeable hiss or clipping in quieter passages, which can be distracting if you’re a music enthusiast like me.

Device compatibility and support

MP3 wins when it comes to compatibility. It’s the universal format that works on everything from 90s-era CD players to modern smartphones. I’ve even found old alarm clocks with MP3 support. AAC, however, isn’t always as widely supported, especially on older hardware.

That said, most newer devices and platforms, like iPhones, Android phones, and streaming services like Spotify, fully support AAC. If you’re living in the modern tech world, AAC compatibility likely won’t be an issue.

Bitrate efficiency: AAC vs. MP3

AAC is more efficient than MP3 at delivering high-quality audio at lower bitrates. Think of it like a fuel-efficient car—AAC gets more “miles per gallon.” At 96 kbps, AAC can sound as good as or better than MP3 at 128 kbps. This is why streaming platforms and digital radio stations prefer AAC; it saves bandwidth while maintaining quality.

I’ve tested this myself by converting the same song into both formats at different bitrates. AAC consistently performed better, preserving details like crisp vocals and dynamic bass lines that MP3 often muddled.

Use cases for AAC and MP3

Both formats have their ideal use cases. MP3 is perfect for older devices or situations where compatibility is critical. For instance, I still use MP3 for transferring music to a friend’s vintage MP3 player or for simple tasks like ringtones.

AAC shines in modern applications, particularly streaming. Apple Music and YouTube use AAC to deliver high-quality audio efficiently. It’s also great for personal libraries if you prioritize quality over universal compatibility.

  • MP3: Best for older hardware and universal compatibility.
  • AAC: Ideal for streaming, modern devices, and high-quality playback.

File size comparison

When I tested file sizes, AAC files were generally smaller than MP3 files at the same perceived quality level. For example, a three-minute song at 128 kbps might take up 3 MB as an MP3 but only 2.5 MB as AAC. Over a large library, this adds up to significant space savings.

It’s like packing a suitcase—AAC is the expert packer who fits everything neatly, while MP3 takes up more room with less care for efficiency.

Encoding speed and performance

Encoding AAC files tends to be slightly slower than MP3 because of its more advanced algorithm. However, in real-world use, this difference is negligible unless you’re encoding hundreds of files at once. I’ve converted albums into both formats, and while AAC took a bit longer, the improved quality made the wait worthwhile.

Which format is better for streaming?

Streaming platforms almost universally prefer AAC. Its efficiency means smoother playback with less buffering, even on slower internet connections. I’ve noticed that AAC streams maintain consistent quality, while MP3 streams can dip or distort under the same conditions.

For streaming, AAC also supports features like HE-AAC, which optimizes audio even further for low-bandwidth scenarios. It’s why platforms like Netflix and YouTube rely on AAC for their audio streams.

Latest words on AAC and MP3 compression

If you’re deciding between AAC and MP3, consider your needs. AAC offers better quality at smaller file sizes and is perfect for modern devices and streaming. MP3, while older, remains reliable and universally compatible. Personally, I’ve transitioned most of my library to AAC, as it delivers superior sound for my listening setup.

For those looking to manage and optimize audio files, tools like Mp4Gain can help you analyze and convert formats efficiently. It’s an excellent way to ensure your files are ready for any playback scenario.

FAQ

Which format offers better audio quality, AAC or MP3?

AAC typically offers better audio quality than MP3 at the same bitrate, delivering richer and clearer sound.

Is AAC better than MP3 for streaming?

Yes, AAC is more efficient and widely used for streaming due to its ability to deliver high-quality audio at lower bitrates.

Can all devices play AAC files?

Most modern devices support AAC, but older hardware might only recognize MP3 files.

Why is AAC more efficient than MP3?

AAC uses advanced compression techniques to retain more audio detail at lower bitrates compared to MP3.

Comments:

Wow, I didn’t know AAC could save that much space without sacrificing quality. Thanks for the detailed comparison!

I’ve always used MP3 for compatibility, but maybe it’s time to switch to AAC for my streaming playlists. Good info here.

Can you explain more about HE-AAC? I feel like it wasn’t covered enough in the article. Thanks in advance!

Great article! I’ve been debating which format to use for my music library. This helped a lot.

I tried converting some MP3 files to AAC, but they didn’t sound much better. Is that normal?

 


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture


Mp4Gain Main Window
picture


Mp4Gain Features
picture


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture

Psychoacoustic Models in MP3 and AAC Encoding

Psychoacoustic Models in MP3 and AAC Encoding

Psychoacoustic Models in MP3 and AAC Encoding

Let’s talk about Psychoacoustic Models in MP3 and AAC Encoding

When it comes to digital audio compression, especially in MP3 and AAC formats, psychoacoustic models are the secret sauce that makes it all work. These models allow us to shrink large audio files into much smaller sizes without a noticeable loss in sound quality. In my years of working with audio encoding, I’ve seen how these models have revolutionized the way we perceive sound after compression. The core idea is simple: we don’t hear all sounds equally. Some frequencies and nuances are more noticeable than others, and psychoacoustic models exploit this fact to make compression more efficient.

Think of it like this: imagine you’re at a concert, and a loud bass guitar is playing alongside a softer violin. Your attention is drawn to the bass because it’s much louder, and the violin’s subtle details get masked. This is exactly what psychoacoustic models do—they remove or reduce sounds that are unlikely to be heard due to masking effects. In this article, I’ll walk you through how psychoacoustic models in MP3 and AAC encoding work and why they matter for audio quality and file size.

Understanding the Basics of Psychoacoustic Models

Psychoacoustic models are based on the science of how our ears and brain perceive sound. They take into account how different sounds mask each other, which frequencies we are most sensitive to, and how we interpret sound in different contexts. MP3 and AAC encoding use these models to compress audio by identifying and removing information that won’t be noticeable to the listener.

A simple analogy would be taking a photograph with a high-resolution camera and then reducing its size by removing some pixels. You won’t notice much difference in the quality of the image because you can’t see all the pixels. Similarly, these audio encoders remove frequencies or audio details that the human ear won’t detect, making the audio file smaller without compromising its perceived quality.

Frequency Masking

  • Frequency masking happens when a louder sound in one frequency range makes a softer sound in a nearby frequency range inaudible.
  • Psychoacoustic models use this to discard or reduce the quieter, masked sounds, optimizing compression.
  • For example, if a heavy guitar is playing at a loud volume, the model might remove the higher-pitched background notes that are masked by the louder guitar.

Temporal Masking

  • Temporal masking occurs when one sound, like a sharp drum hit, can mask a quieter sound that occurs immediately after it.
  • This type of masking is crucial for determining which transient sounds can be removed in compression.
  • For instance, a loud snare hit can mask a subtle violin note that comes milliseconds after, making it unnecessary to keep all the data for that note.

The Role of Psychoacoustic Models in MP3 Encoding

In MP3 encoding, psychoacoustic models play a critical role in reducing the file size while maintaining an acceptable level of sound quality. The MP3 codec was one of the first to use psychoacoustic models to exploit human hearing limitations, and it was revolutionary when it was introduced in the 1990s. The encoder divides audio into different frequency bands and applies masking principles to decide which data can be discarded.

What’s fascinating is that MP3 uses a hybrid of time-domain and frequency-domain processing. It first splits the audio into small segments and then performs a frequency analysis. Using this information, the encoder decides which frequencies can be reduced or eliminated entirely. By doing this, the model allows the MP3 format to achieve relatively small file sizes while preserving the overall listening experience.

MP3 and the Trade-off Between Compression and Quality

  • MP3 encoding sacrifices some of the finer audio details to reduce file size.
  • The trade-off is more noticeable at lower bitrates, where artifacts like compression noise or a “tinny” sound may become audible.
  • Higher bitrates, like 192 kbps or 256 kbps, provide better sound quality, though the file size increases.

AAC: The Next Generation of Psychoacoustic Modeling

While MP3 revolutionized audio compression, AAC (Advanced Audio Codec) takes things a step further. As a more advanced codec, AAC uses a refined psychoacoustic model that performs better at lower bitrates, providing higher-quality audio with less data. This is especially important for modern audio streaming services, which need to balance high-quality sound with efficient bandwidth usage.

The AAC psychoacoustic model is more sophisticated, taking into account additional factors like stereo imaging and spatial effects. It’s also more adept at handling complex audio, such as orchestral music or tracks with a wide range of dynamics. From my experience, AAC does a better job than MP3 in preserving the subtleties of sound, especially at lower bitrates, which is why I recommend it over MP3 when available.

Why AAC Outperforms MP3

  • AAC uses more advanced psychoacoustic techniques, making it more efficient at lower bitrates.
  • It better preserves transient sounds and complex audio elements, like the reverberations of a piano or the nuances of a singer’s voice.
  • With AAC, you can get excellent sound quality at 128 kbps, whereas MP3 may require 192 kbps or higher for a similar result.

How Psychoacoustic Models Help with Audio Quality at Low Bitrates

One of the most remarkable aspects of psychoacoustic models is how they enable high-quality audio at low bitrates. At lower bitrates, many codecs, including MP3 and AAC, might introduce artifacts such as distortion or loss of clarity. However, psychoacoustic models allow the encoder to focus on the most important elements of the sound—those that we are most likely to notice—while discarding the less important parts.

This is especially noticeable in AAC, where the advanced psychoacoustic model ensures that even at low bitrates, the encoding still captures essential auditory information, such as pitch, rhythm, and timbre. I’ve personally found that with AAC, even at 128 kbps, I can enjoy clear vocals and instruments without the harsh artifacts that often accompany MP3 at the same bitrate.

Latest Words on Psychoacoustic Models in MP3 and AAC Encoding

Psychoacoustic models are an integral part of both MP3 and AAC encoding, helping us achieve smaller file sizes while preserving audio quality. These models allow the encoder to reduce the file size by removing sounds that are less perceptible to the human ear, making the audio more efficient without sacrificing what matters most to the listener. While MP3 was groundbreaking in its time, AAC offers superior compression and better handling of complex audio, making it the better choice for modern audio applications.

As I’ve discussed throughout this article, these psychoacoustic models are crucial in ensuring that we can enjoy high-quality audio, even with file sizes that fit comfortably on our devices and bandwidth constraints. Whether you’re listening to your favorite album or streaming a podcast, psychoacoustic models are working behind the scenes to make your audio experience better. As the technology continues to improve, we can only expect even better performance in the future.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are psychoacoustic models in MP3 and AAC encoding?

Psychoacoustic models in MP3 and AAC encoding are based on the way humans perceive sound. These models analyze how different frequencies mask each other, allowing the codecs to remove or reduce the data for sounds that are less noticeable to the human ear. This process helps reduce file size without sacrificing audio quality. Essentially, psychoacoustic models optimize compression by focusing on the most important sounds in an audio file.

How do psychoacoustic models improve audio compression?

Psychoacoustic models improve audio compression by eliminating or reducing sounds that the human ear is less sensitive to. For example, louder sounds can mask softer ones, so the encoder can discard those quieter sounds, saving space without impacting the perceived quality of the audio. This makes it possible to compress audio files into smaller sizes while still delivering high-quality sound, especially in formats like MP3 and AAC.

What is the difference between MP3 and AAC in terms of psychoacoustic models?

The main difference between MP3 and AAC lies in the sophistication of their psychoacoustic models. AAC has a more advanced model that better handles complex audio, such as classical music or tracks with subtle dynamic changes. It also performs better at lower bitrates compared to MP3, providing higher sound quality at the same compression level. In short, AAC offers superior compression efficiency, especially when dealing with modern audio formats and streaming.

Why does AAC sound better than MP3 at lower bitrates?

AAC sounds better than MP3 at lower bitrates because it uses a more efficient psychoacoustic model. The AAC codec is designed to optimize the way it removes or reduces sounds, prioritizing the frequencies that are most important for human perception. This allows it to achieve a better balance between file size and audio quality, especially at bitrates like 128 kbps, where MP3 might begin to show noticeable artifacts.

How does temporal masking affect audio compression?

Temporal masking occurs when a loud sound at one moment in time masks a softer sound that follows it almost immediately. This effect is important for audio compression because it allows the encoder to discard these masked sounds without the listener noticing. This type of masking helps improve compression efficiency, especially in formats like MP3 and AAC, where transient sounds, like a snare hit or cymbal crash, may cover quieter background elements.

Can psychoacoustic models cause distortion in compressed audio?

While psychoacoustic models aim to reduce file size without degrading sound quality, they can sometimes introduce distortion, particularly at lower bitrates. This happens when the codec removes too much data, resulting in noticeable artifacts such as a “tinny” or metallic sound. However, with modern codecs like AAC, these artifacts are much less common, even at lower bitrates, thanks to more advanced psychoacoustic modeling.

Comments:

Wow, I had no idea how much science goes into these audio codecs. Your explanation about frequency and temporal masking really helped me understand why AAC sounds better at lower bitrates. Great article! – AudioFan77

I’ve always been a fan of MP3, but now I’m definitely considering switching to AAC for my music collection. The way you described the differences in psychoacoustic models makes it so much clearer! Thanks! – MusicJunkie88

This article is awesome! The real-life examples helped me visualize how psychoacoustic models work. I never understood how my music could sound so good at a low bitrate, but now I get it. Thanks for the great info! – SoundLover42

Can you talk more about how AAC handles high-frequency sounds compared to MP3? I’d love to know more about that! Great article though, very informative. – HighFreqFan

I didn’t realize how important these psychoacoustic models were in compressing audio. I always wondered how audio streaming services maintain such high-quality sound at lower bitrates. Now I know! – DeeJayDave

This is one of the most detailed articles on this topic I’ve found! I’ve been using AAC for a while now, but this article really made me appreciate how much better it is than MP3, especially for complex audio. – SoundEngineerX

Excellent breakdown of the differences between MP3 and AAC. I always assumed MP3 was “good enough” but now I realize AAC is the better choice, especially for lower bitrates. Thanks for clearing that up! – TechieTom

Great read, but I wish you would’ve gone deeper into how these psychoacoustic models impact the experience for listeners with hearing impairments. Any chance you can dive into that next? – ClearSound76

As a musician, I’ve always been picky about sound quality. After reading this, I’m convinced that AAC is worth the switch for my music files. Thanks for sharing your expertise! – MusicMaker24

I had no idea that psychoacoustic models were so important for compression. I always assumed audio codecs just “squished” the data and that was it! – CuriousGeorge

Very well-written article! I didn’t know much about psychoacoustics before, but now I understand why AAC sounds better at lower bitrates. Thanks for breaking it down so clearly! – TuneInExpert

How Does AAC Compression Work?

AAC compression, audio compression, digital audio compression, audio codec, audio compression algorithm, audio compression software, audio compression format, lossy audio compression.

How Does AAC Compression Work?

AAC Compression
AAC Compression
AAC Compression
AAC Compression

Audio Compression

As someone who works with digital audio on a daily basis, I’m always interested in learning more about audio compression. AAC compression is one of the most popular audio compression methods, used by many music streaming services and online music stores.
According to the book “The Art of Digital Audio Recording,” AAC compression works by “removing audio data that is deemed to be less important to the overall sound.” This is different from lossless compression methods, like FLAC, which preserve all of the original audio data.

Audio Codec

AAC stands for Advanced Audio Coding, and it’s a type of audio codec that is used to compress digital audio files. According to the website of the Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits, “AAC is the most efficient audio codec available today.”
One of the benefits of using AAC compression is that it can significantly reduce the size of audio files without sacrificing too much quality. This makes it a popular choice for music streaming services, which need to deliver high-quality audio to their users while minimizing bandwidth usage.

Lossy Audio Compression

AAC compression is a type of lossy audio compression, which means that some of the original audio data is discarded during the compression process. This is different from lossless compression methods, like FLAC, which preserve all of the original audio data.
In my experience, using AAC compression has allowed me to store more music on my devices without sacrificing too much quality. While there is some loss of audio data, the overall sound quality is still very good, and the reduced file size is definitely worth it.
Final Words:
Overall, AAC compression is a great option for anyone who wants to compress their digital audio files without sacrificing too much quality. And if you’re looking for a way to normalize and convert your audio files, I highly recommend checking out mp4gain.
Keywords: AAC compression, audio compression, digital audio compression, audio codec, audio compression algorithm, audio compression software, audio compression format, lossy audio compression, music streaming, online music store, Fraunhofer Institute, sound quality, file size, mp4gain.
AAC, compression, audio, digital, codec, algorithm, software, format, lossy, music, streaming, online, store, Fraunhofer, efficient, available, today, reduce, size, quality, bandwidth, usage, type, discard, process, devices, sound, good, overall, option, sacrifice, great, checking, normalize, convert, file, recommend, mp4gain, popular, choice, deliver, users, high-quality, data, preserve, original, different, methods, efficient.

What is the AAC format and what are the advantages compared to the mp3?

A designated heir to MP3, this is the most widely used form of encoding today. It is supported, among others, by YouTube, iPhone and Android.

AAC audio format

Over twenty years of honest career, which has allowed music to become truly “pop” and spread around the world, regardless of the playback device used. This is the rather heavy legacy of MP3, a form of multimedia created in the late 1980s and early 1990s by Italian engineer Leonardo Chiariglione. Instead, we now find the AAC, the standard for encrypting audio files developed by Bell Labs, Fraunhofer Institute, Dolby Labs, Sony and Nokia near the end of the last century.

aac format audio digital

Lossy codec, the AAC is considered a model by both ISO (an acronym for the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (an acronym for the International Electrotechnical Commission) and is an integral part of the MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 specifications. After a few years “in the shadows” of MP3 encoding, today AAC encoding is by far the most common and adopted: it is the standard or default audio format for YouTube, iPhone, iPod, iPad, Nintendo DSi, Nintendo 3DS, iTunes, DivX Plus Web Player, PlayStation 3 and is compatible with PlayStation Vita, Wii, Sony Walkman MP3, Android and BlackBerry.

AAC – Differences with MP3 files

The reason for this success is explained by the many improvements that this model presents compared to the one developed by Chiariglione. First of all, AAC manages to guarantee better audio playback quality for the same file size (and therefore bit rates). This is because AAC encoding has a greater variety of samples (8 to 96 kilohertz compared to 16 to 48 kilohertz samples allowed by the MP3 format) and supports a larger number of audio playback channels (up to 48 channels).

AAC – Portable music player

Added to this is the increased flexibility and flexibility of AAC coding, which allows engineers to design and implement coding and decoding algorithms according to their needs. This flexibility feeds real competition, leading to more efficient and effective algorithms. Simply put, a sound file converted to an AAC encoder at the same bit rate will guarantee, as already mentioned, better playback quality than many other competing loss formats.

How to convert MP3 to AAC

The discussion about converting between MP3 and AAC files is not entirely accurate. While the second is a real audio format used in many areas, the second is an encryption algorithm that can be used by different file formats. The most well-known, in this sense, are “.m4a”, “.mp4”, “.3gp”, “.m4b” and “.m4p”. To convert MP3 to AAC, therefore, you must select one of the forms listed above.

However, converting your MP3 music collection does not require any specific action. You need to select one of the many existing audio conversion programs (or even a special web portal for file conversion) and select the tracks or albums for editing.

AAC audio formats

AAC audio formats

When we talk about the different audio formats that we have available for our work or entertainment, we usually hear that there is the MP3 format, Dolby type sound, and in some cases it has audio in the AAC format.

This last audio format is very characteristic of some movies found on DVD discs, which comes to be a technical specification that means Advanced Audio Coding, or translated into Spanish “advanced audio coding”, and which actually comes to be an extremely important resource for those editors who work in the video area.

Working with the AAC audio format represents having a better sound quality than many of the cases is distributed to different speakers, perfectly defined in terms of the position they should occupy in an appropriate environment; In addition, this AAC audio format tends to occupy a smaller space than an MP3 audio format would occupy, which in the design of a DVD disc comes to be known as Layer 3 type audio, which is widely used in the compilation of audio and video for the formation of a DVD movie. But the important thing is that this AAC format provides high-fidelity audio quality and that many times it is used for the well-known “no-home” formats.

It is there where the conveniences of using this AAC audio format are found, since by occupying 30% less space than an MP3 audio file, having better quality and fidelity in its sound, it is widely used not only by those film editors DVD, but also by iTunes as well as by many music discs they represent today.

AAC (Advanced Audio Coding) is a digital audio signal computer format based on a lossy compression algorithm, a process by which some of the audio data is removed in order to obtain the highest possible degree of compression, resulting in an output file that sounds as close to the original as possible.

features

AAC uses a variable bit rate VBR, an encoding method that adapts the number of bits used per second to encode audio data, depending on the complexity of the audio stream at any given time. AAC is an encoding algorithm Broadband audio that has superior performance than MP3, produces better quality on small files and requires less system resources to encode and decode. This codec is oriented to broadband uses and is based on the elimination of redundancies of the acoustic signal, as well as on compression by means of the modified discrete cosine transform (MDCT), very similar to that of MP3.

Advantage

Superior audio quality for the same bitrate (kbps) your Radio at 32kbps will sound like 128kbps in mp3. Stereo sound support from 16 kbps unlike MP3 that supports it from 40 kbps. Support on Blackberry, Iphone, Smartphone equipment. Members of the codec family aacPlus aacPlus v1 is the combination of AAC and SBR, as the high-efficiency standardization profile in MPEG-4 (HE AAC). aacPlus v2 builds on the strong success story of aacPlus v1 and adds value in all fields where increased compression efficiency of stereo signals is mission critical. aacPlus v2 is a true superset of aacPlus v1, aacPlus v1 is from AAC. With the addition of Parametric Stereo in MPEG, aacPlus v2 is the current state of the art low-bit-rate open standard audio codec. Not compatible with MPEG-1. Sample Rate: 96 KHz, 88.2 KHz, 48 KHz, 44.1 KHz, 24 KHz, 22.05 KHz, 16 KHz. Maximum quality between 320 and 448 kbps (5 channels) and between 128 and 192 (2 channels) Maximum supported bitrate: From 12 kbps (in HE-AACv2 profile) to 448 kbps (in AAC-LC profile)

Three options

Highest quality (resolution at 23.43 Hz and 2.6 ms) Non prediction Scalable sampling rates

Three types of profiles:

AAC-LC: 16 KBps to 448 KBps HE-AAC: 16 KBps to 128 KBps HE-AACv2: 12 KBps to 56 KBps (most efficient profile in audio quality)

Differences Aac plus vs MP3

When deciding which compression format to choose to take full advantage of own resources such as those of the listener in streaming broadcasts, one of these two alternatives is generally considered.

mp3 vs aac

MP3 or MPEG-1 Audio Layer 3:

It is a standard compressed digital audio format with loss, the loss of information from the mp3 format is not audible by the human ear, therefore we will not distinguish the difference between an uncompressed audio file and an mp3 file.

In addition an mp3 file manages to reduce the size of the sound file without influencing its quality, approximately 1 minute of audio in mp3 format occupies 1 MB with a quality almost equal to the quality of Cd.

These advantages have achieved that the mp3 format can be played in almost all audio players, which is the format par excellence for the exchange through the internet, one of the best options at this time to store music with good quality, and also The audio format that is most used in portable players is a standard and therefore compatibility with all media is guaranteed.

The mp3 audio format allows you to select the quality of the audio that we are going to compress, the quality of cd would be equivalent to 128 Kbps (Bit rate), but we can select the compression between 8 Kbps and 320 Kbps taking into account that the higher the transmission of data (Kbps), the greater the use of broadband resources for both the broadcast and the reception by the listener.

AACplus: MP4 / aacPlus (HE-AAC) Enconder v 1.31; Stereo
As in the mp3, in the aacplus there is a solution for the little width for the channels. This is what is known as “Parametric Stereo” and corresponds to what is known as HE-AAC v2. Unlike what happens in the case of mp3, it is not convenient to use this option in high bitrates, in this case over 48kbps.

Considerations:

Quality assessments are expressed in percentages, with 100% being the overall quality of the original file.
The valuations are merely estimates but are intended to faithfully reflect the differences in quality between the different formats to the different bitrates.
The best alternatives for each format have been marked with red, according to the relationship of quality and consumption of own resources when emitting and resources of the listeners to correctly receive the audio.
Conclusions:

The first and most important regarding the mp3 is that, even in its highest quality, it is already obsolete. In any bitrate it is surpassed by the others so it will always be preferable to perform compression to any other of the subsequent formats. Ogg Vorbis and mpc are better quality formats that far exceed the mp3 but we have not included because they are not widely used. There are also several other formats that offer better compression.
For the mp3 the best bitrate is at 128kbps or 192 kbps, with a minimal difference in quality. Above that the difference is imperceptible and inferior to it is widely discernible.
At 72/74% the AAC PLUS format beats its competitors widely in the 48 / 64kbps being the best choice in the range. It will depend on the original file, as well as the greater or lesser preponderance of the high, medium and low. The decrease in fidelity is easily noticeable but it is not too much and many people will have no problem accepting it.
Under 128kbps, the quality of the mp3 drops considerably, while in the AAC PLUS format the decrease is not as pronounced. In the latter, it can be seen that between 128 and 48kbps the decrease in quality is minimal, with a difference of only 7%. Therefore, it is not worth compressing at 128kbps or at 96kbps having the option of doing so at 48 or 64 with a minimal difference in quality.

Advantages of AAC with respect to MP3

The AAC format supports multichannel sound which is an appropriate audio codec for the surround sound of 6 or more speakers, although it is currently not the most supported codec for it. However, MP3 only allows, in its base format, stereo sound.
It can reach a sampling frequency of 96khz, used in recording studios. MP3 is designed for playback only and to reach up to 48khz.
The sound quality is considerably superior to the same birate. This means that it is possible to encode an audio file in AAC with a bitrate lower than the equivalent in MP3 while maintaining the same sound quality. An audio file in HE-AAC encoded at 48kbps can offer a quality similar to an MP3 encoded at 128kbps.
Even at very low bitrates (32kbps or less) the sound suffers little loss compared to MP3. This could be