Are you sure you listen to music well?

It is frequent to listen to low quality music without realizing it. But how can you tell if an audio file is of good quality? Do you know what you hear

How can you tell if an audio file is of good quality?

Today we listen to music from different devices and continuously. It often happens unintentionally – in stores, banks, supermarkets, advertisements, and many other situations, even without being brought to our iPod (if still in use). But when we decide to listen to music voluntarily, are we sure we listen to it well?

Audio quality

Be careful, reading this article can make sound fetishists so hostile to your company of friends. If you continue reading, you deserve this anecdote.

I was in the car with friends, when suddenly I heard one of my favorite songs come out of the speakers. Although I turned the volume knob on the ball, the sound was still very muffled. Blame the speakers? Maybe, but not in that case. To my quick question (demanding that you heard the “noise of the Titanic”), I received a very simple answer: “I downloaded it from a YouTube video.”

Best Audio Quality

Now, I am absolutely not here to moralize anyone, because for better or for worse we have downloaded all the songs from YouTube, however there is one important factor to consider: how can you understand if an audio file is of good quality?

Let’s start with this assumption: Buying the records and / or buying the songs in the digital stores will surely feel great if played on certain systems. That said, the two macrocategories for listening to music are:

The type of the audio file.

The type of sound emitting system / device
Lossless discs and files are the best to listen to. By avoiding delving into complex technicalities by converting files to .mp3 there is compression that reduces digital size at the expense of quality. The unit of measure for quality is kbps (kilo bits per second) and the best value of all is 320 kbps (we tend to scale 256, 192, 128, 96, and 64 kbps). Pseudo-decent performance occurs (but with high data loss) at 128 kbps. It is better to always be on top.

While this doesn’t make sense to nerds, many people ignore these factors because they don’t know they are listening to songs about which 30% of the instruments may not fully perceive. Please note that Spotify allows you to choose the type of audio quality only in the Premium version and the lowest or “Normal” function is at 96 kbps. Also, if you ever download songs illegally from YouTube, many unofficial videos already have poor startup audio, let alone convert them to low-quality .mp3.

Now let’s say we have a song with the best possible quality on our mobile. The problem is to listen to it from a medium that has decent characteristics. To assess this, you must rely on the frequency response or how closely the audible frequencies are reproduced to the human ear by the speakers / headphones or the vehicle in question. We hear from 20 Hertz to 20,000 Hertz (also called 20kHz), this range varies with age and trauma (eg disk). It is correct to possibly check the frequency response of your vehicle: if you buy 5 euros headphones in a store, it will not have a great result, no matter how much the brain comes to us trying to hypothetically recreate incomplete or missing frequencies. It should be remembered that there are other, much more complex factors for optimal hearing, which can be easily explored on the web or in sound theory books.

Going back to the initial anecdote, we were in a Panda ten years ago, with the original Fiat speakers and we listened to a low-quality song downloaded from an unofficial YouTube video. Worse than that, one could not ask, therefore, on second thought, could not have said anything, while that opaque discontent would have been covered by my discontents and for those there are no remedies.

Lossless audio formats

Lossless audio formats

We will show you the formats that maintain all the quality of the audio files, compressing just enough. Lossless formats tend to maintain the original quality almost totally, suffering a minimum loss of quality. In summary, they are slightly compressed so that the audio remains intact and the size on disk is smaller.

Among the Lossless formats we have:

FLAC, is a format whose algorithm is similar to ZIP or GZip, but specially designed for audio compression. While ZIP would compress a CD quality audio file from 10% to 20% of its original size, FLAC would compress it from 30% to 50% while maintaining the full quality of the source.

Monkey’s Audio (APE), like FLAC allows lossless compression, but the greatness of Monkey’s is that it compresses bit by bit, reaching data rates of up to 700kbps without any loss of quality.

Apple Lossless (ALAC) uses an MP4 container (with a .M4A extension) for its files just like the MPEG-4 AAC and is specially created for use on the iPod.

Shorten is another Lossless format with characteristics similar to Monkey’s Audio or FLAC, but using the .SHN extension and requires fewer resources for its reproduction.

WavPack uses a hybrid mode, unlike the other Lossless formats, since it uses a Lossy file, which creates a relatively small file at high quality, and a corrector file that recovers the remaining quality of the original file, resulting in an audio file at averages between Lossless and Lossy, but with the same quality as a compressed file with any other Lossless algorithm.

TTA (True Audio) is a free and free LossLess format that reduces by 30% the original size of the source audio file and uses compression / decompression in real time.

What are the advantages of listening to music in FLAC format?

The FLAC format allows us to save audio without loss of quality. This codec encodes the file with the same information that the original CD would have (which would be the WAV file).

Flac

It is an open source format (Free Lossless Audio Codec) that could be improved, thanks to its registration as an open source license.

Higher quality, especially for HiFi equipment: this format allows us to enjoy a bitrate between 900 and 1100 kbps that does not delete information as it does in the MP3, even if it is of high quality. You will notice a warmer, fuller and cleaner sound.
The information is continuous between tracks: just like on the original CD, you can listen to music without interruptions between tracks.
The music is not altered: and that is the main reason why FLAC is ideal. Well, the file you use is the same one that you would download from the CD.
The FLAC format supports unlimited sampling rates – a FLAC can reproduce frequencies of 192,000 Hz without problem.
However, all that it reduces is not gold. There are also some problems with FLACs that you should be aware of, although they are not serious at all.

Disadvantages of listening to music in FLAC format

They take up more: as a FLAC file usually takes up a little more than half of the original CD file. It is easy for an album to go to 300 MB.
Many players do not support FLAC – this is changing in a beastly way. But the industry has fought for the MP3 to the last breath and many players, radios, etc. do not yet support this standard.
That is, the disadvantages are or rather were. In the future we will have a new cleaner format, which will surely take up less space and be an evolution of FLAC. Currently, however, it is the format par excellence and the one that we should all use, although I am not sure that a new, closed format will not come out, that can cope with it before it reaches its peak.