best lossy audio format Archives

Are your ears worthy of your headphones?

Free Download Mp4Gain

Are your ears worthy of your headphones?…

The process of human hearing sound is very complicated.

But compared to the metaphysics of headphones and audio, the complexity of the human ear is basically not worth mentioning. But before we get into whether Beats is shallow, whether Sony is good, and whether headphone noise reduction is good for your ears, let’s take a look at what we’re talking about when it comes to sound quality. It may be that when you feel that the sound quality of a certain headset is not good, the problem is in your ears or in the sound file itself.

01 What is sound quality?

The essence of music and sound is the vibration of air, and sound quality is generally attributed to three aspects: volume, pitch, and timbre.

Everyone knows the volume and the tone is Do Re Mi Fa Sol La Ti. And what is the tone?

The American National Standards Institute defines timbre as “…a sensory attribute by which a listener can judge that two tones of the same volume and pitch are not the same.” We can tell the difference between a guitar playing a 440Hz tone and a piano playing a 440Hz tone.

The sound reproduced by different headphones is different, and the timbre is also different. However, in terms of volume, different headphones will also have a certain volume difference due to different internal circuitry; as for the tone, there is no obvious change without accident.

02Digital recording and analog recording

There is no doubt that pre-CD audio carriers: magnetic tapes, vinyl records, etc., are all analog recording products. The word “analog” is also translated as “analog”, in short, it restores and reproduces the vibration in the air at that moment in a physical way. Whether it’s vinyl or tape, physical features such as bumps, depressions, or magnetic dust splits on tape or disc are used to restore the vibrance detail of the audio.

But in the age of CDs and computers, all audio vibrations are converted to 0 or 1 on the surface of the disc and go into the so-called binary algorithm. After decoding, it is restored to physical vibration.

In popular music recordings, there are probably three most common formats:

44.1 kHz, 16-bit waveform

320kb mp3

128kb mp3

Free Download Mp4Gain

Mp4Gain Main Window

Mp4Gain Features

Free Download Mp4Gain

Mp3, is it the best format for music and sound?

People are looking for the best audio and video quality in 2022, what is it?

If you are seriously looking for high-quality audio and video, we advise you to stay away from the data-throwing fundamentalists and adopt a more practical attitude.

First of all you must ask yourself, on which devices will you listen to the audio or see the videos.

We have listened to dozens of fundamentalists who use numbers and certain statements as dogmas and have turned even this discussion of quality into a dogma.

And that is diametrically different from the simple my real aspiration to really enjoy the best audio and video quality that your equipment can deliver and that your eyes and ears are capable of detecting.

Mathematical statements are useless if you do not have an HD computer to listen to your audios and watch your videos.

Nor if the extreme is reached where the difference is already indistinguishable for 99.99% of the population.

It is fully demonstrated that for 99.99% of the population, even for those who have auditory training, an mp3 with 320 kbps and 48000 as sample rate is indistinguishable from a WAV or FLAC.

You can improve your audio with Mp4Gain regardless if you decide to continue using mp3s or prefer to switch to FLAC (Mp4Gain can convert and use these and other formats like ogg, m4a, etc)

In short, the discussion of sound quality should be based more on actually hearing the best possible audio and not a fundamentalist discussion about numbers.

The audio formats with the best sound quality

audio formats

In addition, when editing, because some details have been compressed and sacrificed, the editing space is relatively small.

audio formats

It should be noted that the sound quality will be compromised every time these formats are output. After too many output programs, the quality can be terrible, so the number of times of recompression and conversion should be reduced.

Pros: small file size, maximum device compatibility

Disadvantages: destructive compression leads to loss of sound quality, less spatial flexibility for reissue

Resume
When it comes to sound files for editing, it’s ideal to work with uncompressed formats like .WAV or .AIFF. Such a format allows users to get the greatest degree of tolerance and freedom when editing, and most of these file formats are still supported, regardless of software or equipment. Also, when the video is output at the end of the project, the music file will still be compressed, so it’s ideal to use a file format with higher sound quality from the start, which is ideal for a project that needs to go through post-edit layers. But if it is based on the premise of convenient, fast and easy-to-use transmission, .MP3 can still meet your needs without sacrificing sound quality.

Mp4Gain is a program that allows you not only to normalize the audio of your sound or cvideo files, but also to improve the quality and offers you to perform a whole series of modifications so that you have better audio quality used.

The audio formats with the best sound quality

First of all, divide all types of music files into three parts as follows:

Uncompressed file formats: .WAV, .AIFF

Lossless compression formats: .FLAC, .ALAC (Apple Lossless)

Destructive compression formats: .MP3, .AAC, .WMA, .OGG

Below are their respective advantages and disadvantages.

1. Uncompressed file format
Uncompressed music files are just like the concept of Raw files. Essentially no compression will of course have the best sound quality. (The sample rate and bit rate of the original recording are also very important. If the compressed music file is converted to an uncompressed file, the music won’t magically improve the sound quality.)

The most common disadvantage of uncompressed files is the file size. Generally, the file size of a song is around 25 ~ 40 MB. While that capacity is no longer an issue for cloud hard drives, it is still an issue for email. Also big (25MB max for Gmail attachments). Also, some portable music players or devices may not be able to play such music files.

Advantages: original sound reproduction, no compression, lossless, easier to use in post production

Disadvantages: large file format, fewer supported devices

2. Lossless compression format
The term “compressed and lossless” seems contradictory, but compression does not necessarily affect sound quality. More precisely, it’s more like “compressed to save space”. It’s like compressing a high quality file into a .ZIP and decompressing it when you want to use it, the quality of the file will not be affected.

Therefore, this type of file has a compressed capacity, but the file will be decompressed during playback to restore sound quality. Although the concept of reducing capacity without affecting sound quality is great, the downside is that support for this format is extremely low and in order to decompress the file during playback, an additional codec is required to use it, and it will. also take some performance.

Advantages: small file capacity (about 1/2 ~ 1/3 lossless files), good sound quality

Disadvantages: Decompression can eat performance when used, and support from hardware or software is extremely low

3. Destructive compression format
The destructive compression format is currently the most common music file format, the main reason is that it has the greatest compatibility with portable devices (mobile phones, MP3 players, etc.), and the files are small and have a space of limited storage. , users can store more music (compressed capacity is about one-tenth of lossless sound quality), and most of the music provided by today’s streaming media is files in this format. There is always a price to pay for smaller files. Compared to lossless formats, this destructive compression will affect the audio range that the original sound can present and will cause some distortion. So, to be safe, keep the compression rate above 320 kbps as much as possible.

About Lossy

About Lossy

Lossy

We all love good music. More recently, the audio CD was good digital music. This is 44100 Hz, stereo, 16 bits (linear) per channel, not compressed in any way, which means, according to Wikipedia, 1411.2 kbps.

Lossy

But at the end of the 20th century, in the era of the birth of multimedia, when music began to be played not only on players, but also on computers, it turned out that the audio CD (that is, naked PCM) is even better. . compress. There was, for example, Microsoft ADPCM, which compressed this case a bit, without losing quality, in WAV files. But generally speaking, the original 44 kHz stereo would still require a lot of space this way. Hence, the quality dropped to 22 kHz mono. One of the first multimedia albums of that time: “Immersion” from the group “Nautilus Pompilius”, is still around, and I did.

So MP3 won. To store and distribute compressed music. At 128 kbps “CD Quality”.

MP3 came up strangely. Technically, this is MPEG-1 Audio Layer 3. A layer for compressing audio data into a modern, progressive standard for storing video data on Video CDs. Just packed in its own .mp3 file format. The video CD is no longer interesting to anyone. The following MPEG-2 standard is used in DVD and digital television broadcasts (not HD). And the next MPEG-4 standard is now used for HD video and continues to evolve.

MP3 was revolutionary. It was (almost) the first lossy compression format. When we don’t try to preserve everything that was in the original signal, but, based on some psychoacoustic model, we cut out what a person is not going to hear anyway, and compress the rest. Like JPEG.

Then I tried digitizing the accumulated audio collection. Compact cassettes (just “cassettes”, but more correctly “compact cassettes”) turned out to be complete shit. The frequency range is such that it makes no sense to sample with more than 22 kHz. There were no reel-to-reel recorders in the house. But vinyl records shook the sound quality. With good equipment, you can draw better quality than a CD. You just need to get rid of the clicks.

And then I realized that MP3 is shit too. At these same 128 kbps, the sound quality suffers greatly. And the scariest thing is that vile metallic hues appear where they shouldn’t be. My ears need at least 192 kbps, and the more the better.

Let’s take a hint from a famous punk rock band in the past. Like FLAC. It is such a modern lossless compression standard that it has successfully replaced WAV. Because it is free.

The original is CD quality, so frequencies up to 22 kHz are present as expected.

Original flac

We are going to harvest with FFmpeg, or rather with LAME.

At 320 kbps and 256 kbps, the spectrogram looks almost like the original.

At 192 kbps, there are signs of a 16 kHz cutoff. The spectrogram “darkens”, apparently, the psychoacoustic model has cut something out. By ear, the higher frequency “bursts” really disappeared.

MP3 192 kbps

At the notorious 128 kbit / s, everything is already specifically cut off at 16 kHz. Background sounds are “fuzzy” and begin to bubble. Nothing to do with the original in terms of enjoying the musical details.

MP3 128 kbps

But you can do 64 kbps in MP3. The stereo is gone. Everything gurgles terribly and irritates with completely strange sounds.