MP3 and FLAC audio formats Part 6


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture

MP3 and FLAC audio formats Part 6

Audio Formats

At the conclusion of this article, I cannot ignore one of the most popular questions from locals: which is better, FLAC or MP3?

Audio Format

The questioner generally wants to get a simple, unequivocal, and fair answer in all cases. However, there is no such thing and it cannot be. Below, I will give my opinion on when and why each of the discussed formats should be used.

In terms of sound quality, experience shows that with a competent approach to the MP3 compression process, the difference between MP3 and non-hearing loss formats is very small in the vast majority of situations. Only well-trained people can reliably record differences when listening to proper music on high-end equipment. Yes, there are specially selected test samples where the lossy compression artifacts are clearly visible to everyone, but ask yourself a question: are you planning to listen to these samples or is it just ordinary music? Overall, the bottom line is clear: MP3 is more than adequate as a music storage format for high-quality playback. But I will repeat once more: this thesis is true only if the audio files are prepared correctly. Unfortunately, the web is full of MP3s,

To form your own unbiased opinion on the topic under discussion, I strongly recommend that the reader personally try different formats in blind tests. This is not only educational, but also quite an exciting activity.

Now let’s see the advantages of using FLAC or other lossless formats.

Unlike the situation with MP3, where the quality of the output is highly dependent on the encoder ratings, in principle it is impossible to spoil the sound with compression in FLAC. Therefore, the question of how and how the material was coded loses its relevance (with the exception of the clinical cases of FLAC production by loss described above, but this is easily verified). When listening to lossless music, you can be sure that imperfections in the sound, if any, are not the result of someone’s crooked hands at the compression stage, but rather a property of the original phonogram that you have to accept with.
The same confidence that the registry is stored “as is”, without irreversible loss, provides some people with psychological comfort. In an area as subtle as audio, this factor can be quite significant.
The lossless material is ideal for a variety of processes: it can be compressed into any other format, edited, cut into samples without fear of getting “canned meat” at the output. For those who are serious about sound, this is important.
Isn’t all of the above about you? Then there is no point in bothering with lossless formats, feel free to use MP3 or other lossy formats.

Personally, at home, I save and listen to music mainly in FLAC, and I make MP3 myself if necessary, for example to use on portable devices.


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture


Mp4Gain Main Window
picture


Mp4Gain Features
picture


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture

MP3 and FLAC audio formats Part 5

MP3 and FLAC audio formats Part 5

Audio File Format

FLAC encoding and decoding

audio file format

Let’s consider file compression with the FLAC encoder, which can be downloaded here. For it to work, we need the flac.exe file. If you run it without parameters, you will get a short help on using the encoder. For detailed help, type flac –help (the information will be displayed) or flac –help> usage.txt (the information will be displayed in the uses.txt file).

WAV to FLAC encoding with default compression ratio (5):

flac infile.wav

WAV to FLAC encoding with specified compression ratio:

flac -n infile.wav where n is a number from 0 (minimum compression) to 8 (maximum compression).

FLAC to WAV decoding:

flac -d infile.flac

To ensure that FLAC compresses the data without loss, you can use any software that can compare files bit by bit, for example the built-in Windows utility fc. For the experiment, select any WAV file and perform the following transformations on it: original.wav (original file)> compressed.flac (encode file to FLAC)> decompressed.wav (decode FLAC back to WAV). Next, compare original.wav and decompressed.wav using fc in binary comparison mode:

fc / b original.wav decompressed.wav

After the verification is complete, the utility will display the message “No differences found between files”, indicating your full identity. This means that when converting to FLAC and vice versa, not a single bit was lost, which needed testing. If you do the same experiment with MP3, the result will be completely different, there will be a lot of differences between the files.

MP3 and FLAC audio formats Part 4

MP3 and FLAC audio formats Part 4

Audio File Formats

Does the encoder setting affect the sound quality when compressing in FLAC? What compression ratio should I choose?

Music File Formats

The FLAC encoder settings do not affect the sound quality at all. Only the size of the resulting files and the time spent on compression can depend on them, and even that is negligible. So most of the time I don’t bother and code in FLAC with the default settings, which I advise you to do as well. In rare cases, when you need to get files of the minimum size and have to save every byte, it makes sense to increase the compression ratio to the maximum value.

Does the cable box affect the sound quality when listening to FLAC material? What is the best way to play FLAC on your PC?

In the case of FLAC and other lossless formats, the decoder does not affect the sound quality, the original audio data is restored with bit precision during playback. Therefore, to listen to FLAC, you can use any player that supports this format and you personally like it. However, I will once again recommend foobar2000 as a time-tested all-in-one solution for playing music on Windows.

MP3 encoding and decoding with LAME
As mentioned above, in the case of MP3, the sound quality of the resulting files is directly dependent on the choice of the encoder and its settings during compression. To date, the LAME encoder provides the best results for this format. The original project site seems a bit confusing, so I’ll immediately give a link to the files. From the archive, we need the lame.exe file. We open the command line.

For a quick reference on using LAME, type lame –help (the information will be displayed) or lame –help> usage.txt (the information will be displayed in the uses.txt file). For detailed help, replace –help with –longhelp.

Let’s get straight to the compression functionality. Should bit rate and other compression settings be specified separately? No, this is completely optional, the developers did most of the work for us, making it as easy as possible to use the encoder. LAME has a set of presets (presets) that allow the user to obtain excellent results with a minimum of technical knowledge. Almost all presets use VBR (Variable Bit Rate) mode, which provides an optimal balance between sound quality and file size. The command invokes help for the lame presets –preset help. Let’s consider the most relevant presets.

The preset standard. Description of built-in help:

This preset should be “transparent” to most people in most music, with a fairly high quality.

The average bit rate when using the standard is 170-210 kbps, the HF cutoff starts at about 18.7 kHz. I recommend using this preset as the default mode, it is the most balanced in terms of combination of features.

Encode WAV to MP3 with this preset:

lame –preset standard infile.wav outfile.mp3, where infile.wav is the name of the source WAV file, outfile.mp3 is the name of the resulting MP3 file (the latter can be omitted).

Extreme preset. Description of built-in help:

If you have extremely good hearing and the same equipment, this preset will give you slightly higher-than-standard quality.

The average bit rate when extreme is used is 220-260 kbps, the high pass filter is not used. I recommend using this preset when you want to get MP3 with very high sound quality. When listening to music on an average computer, this preset, compared to the standard, generally does nothing more than increase the file size.

Encode WAV to MP3 with this preset:

lame –preset extreme infile.wav outfile.mp3

MP3 and FLAC audio formats Part 3

MP3 and FLAC audio formats Part 3

Audio File Formats

Is it possible to compress material from loss to loss, eg MP3 with lower bit rate to MP3 with higher bit rate?

audio file formats

If you want to get an improvement in the quality of such a clamp, then no, you do not need to do this: the sound will not only not improve, but will even slightly deteriorate. If your goal is to reduce file size and sound quality is not very critical, then compressing from a higher bit rate to a lower one is quite justified.

Which lossless format is the best in terms of sound quality: FLAC, Monkey’s Audio, WavPack?

As mentioned above, lossless formats compress data losslessly. This means that, in terms of sound quality, they are all absolutely identical. You should choose a lossless format to use in each specific case, focusing solely on its compatibility with the software / equipment and your personal preferences.

Does the choice of encoder and its settings affect the sound quality when compressing material to MP3?

It affects significantly. About which encoder and with what settings provides the optimal result, I will tell you below.

Does the cable box affect the sound quality when listening to MP3 material? What is the best way to play MP3 on PC?

The MP3 decoder can affect the sound quality. Some decoders (especially older ones) noticeably distort the sound when playing MP3, which can create a false impression of the inferiority of this format as such. To play music on a PC, you must use proven playback programs, preferably the latest versions. I use foobar2000, which I recommend to everyone; it has no problem with the quality of playback of MP3 and other supported formats.

Does the encoder setting affect the sound quality when compressing in FLAC? What compression ratio should I choose?

The FLAC encoder settings do not affect the sound quality at all. Only the size of the resulting files and the time spent on compression can depend on them, and even that is negligible. So most of the time I don’t bother and code in FLAC with the default settings, which I advise you to do as well. In rare cases, when you need to get files of the minimum size and have to save every byte, it makes sense to increase the compression ratio to the maximum value.

Does the cable box affect the sound quality when listening to FLAC material? What is the best way to play FLAC on your PC?

In the case of FLAC and other lossless formats, the decoder does not affect the sound quality, the original audio data is restored with bit precision during playback. Therefore, to listen to FLAC, you can use any player that supports this format and you personally like it. However, I will once again recommend foobar2000 as a time-tested all-in-one solution for playing music on Windows.

MP3 and FLAC Audio Formats Part 2

MP3 and FLAC Audio Formats Part 2

Audio Formats

MP3 (MPEG-1 Layer 3) is historically the first and most widespread lossy compression format.

AUDIO FORMAT

Despite the fact that, due to the era of MP3, today it does not shine with the efficiency of compression, its popularity is still very high due to its versatility: any plate can reproduce this format. At the same time, if a suitable encoder and decoder are used, the MP3 sound quality is at a very decent level. The combination of these two factors justifies the use of the format today. The MP3 compression ratio while maintaining high sound quality is 6 to 9 times. The average bit rate of such an MP3 with 16-bit / 44.1 kHz / stereo parameters is 150-240 kbps, the file size of a five-minute recording in this form is 6-9 MB.

FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) is currently the most popular lossless audio compression format. If lossless support is claimed for any software or hardware, this software / hardware can almost certainly play FLAC. The format is the de facto standard among lovers of high-quality sound. The FLAC compression ratio is 1.2 to 3.5 times. FLAC bitrate with 16 bit / 44.1 kHz / stereo parameters – 400-1200 kbps, the file size of a five minute recording in this form is 15-44 MB. For lossless formats, of which FLAC is a representative, the rule “higher bit rate – higher sound quality” does not work, the quality always remains identical to the original. The compression ratio and bit rate vary depending on the complexity of the material to be compressed; for example, singing on a guitar lends itself to compression better than recording a symphony orchestra.

Is it possible to compress material without loss to loss, for example from FLAC to MP3?

It is possible and often necessary. For example, if you want to listen to music in “field” conditions from a portable device without audiophile habits, and your source material is stored in lossless format, then it makes sense to make the desired tracks lossy before transferring them to the laptop. . This will reduce the file size and save much more music on your mobile device. Most likely, you won’t feel the sound degradation from such a transformation at all.

Is it possible to compress material from lossy to lossless, eg from MP3 to FLAC?

This should not be done in any case, as the sound quality will not improve and the file size will increase significantly. Also, such a pseudo-lossless, then caught by other people, will deceive them. How to rule out such fakes when downloading losslessly from the network, read this article.

Is it possible to compress material from loss to loss, eg MP3 with lower bit rate to MP3 with higher bit rate?

If you want to get an improvement in the quality of such a clamp, then no, you do not need to do this: the sound will not only not improve, but will even slightly deteriorate. If your goal is to reduce file size and sound quality is not very critical, then compressing from a higher bit rate to a lower one is quite justified.

Which lossless format is the best in terms of sound quality: FLAC, Monkey’s Audio, WavPack?

As mentioned above, lossless formats compress data losslessly. This means that, in terms of sound quality, they are all absolutely identical. You should choose a lossless format to use in each specific case, focusing solely on its compatibility with the software / equipment and your personal preferences.

Is it possible to compress material without loss to loss, for example from FLAC to MP3?

It is possible and often necessary. For example, if you want to listen to music in “field” conditions from a portable device without audiophile habits, and your source material is stored in lossless format, then it makes sense to make the desired tracks lossy before transferring them to the laptop. . This will reduce the file size and save much more music on your mobile device. Most likely, you won’t feel the sound degradation from such a transformation at all.

Is it possible to compress material from lossy to lossless, eg from MP3 to FLAC?

This should not be done in any case, as the sound quality will not improve and the file size will increase significantly. Also, such a pseudo-lossless, then caught by other people, will deceive them. How to rule out such fakes when downloading losslessly from the network, read this article.

MP3 and FLAC audio formats

MP3 and FLAC audio formats

FLAC vs MP3

In this post, I want to talk about how to get the best results when compressing music in FLAC and MP3 formats.

FLAC vs MP3

In the age of mass distribution of audio and video streaming services, this topic may seem of little relevance, however, as practice shows, this is not the case. First of all, not everyone wants to depend on third-party resources, which at any time can behave as they please, from the introduction of various access restrictions to content to its complete removal. Second, there are many places in the world where the Internet is slow, dreary, and with lunch breaks. Third, the sound quality when listening online is generally quite acceptable to most users, but it can make sophisticated listeners with good equipment bleak. Taking into account all of the above, we can assume

Since this article will focus on Windows console applications, it is assumed that the reader is familiar with the basics of working on the command line on this operating system.

Basic concepts
PCM (pulse code modulation), also known as PCM (pulse code modulation) is a method of representing an analog signal in digital form. It works like this: electrical oscillations are fed into the input of a device called ADC (analog to digital converter), which is an analog audio signal. The ADC measures the level of this signal with a certain frequency and transmits the obtained values ​​to the outside, where they are stored. Thus, a data matrix is ​​formed, which is a sequence of values ​​of the amplitude of the original signal. The process described is called “digitization”. The main problem with storing PCM data in “naked” form is its rather large volume, therefore, for a more rational use of space on the carrier, various digital audio compression algorithms are used.

CDDA (Compact Disc Digital Audio) is a good old audio CD, historically the first mass digital media standard for audio recordings. Despite the fact that in our time the CDDA itself is no longer very relevant, the sound presentation parameters in it (PCM 16 bit / 44.1 kHz / stereo) are still basic for almost all published musical phonograms.

WAV is an audio format commonly used to store uncompressed PCM audio in Windows. The format can also contain compressed data, but in practice this is extremely rare and, one might say, rude. Playing WAV files requires minimal system resources, as no additional information processing is required for this. Saving material in this format is almost always an intermediate step in sound processing in audio editors, CD grabbers, and other similar software. The bit rate of uncompressed WAV with 16-bit / 44.1 kHz / stereo parameters is 1411 kbps, the file size of a five-minute recording in this form is approximately 52 MB.

Encoder (or “encoder” from English “encoder”) is software designed to convert WAV to any other format in order to reduce the amount of stored data.

Decoder – Software or hardware used to play files compressed in the appropriate format or convert them to uncompressed format.

Lossy is the generic name for a family of audio formats that use lossy data compression. Typical family members are MP3, AAC, WMA, Ogg Vorbis. The main characteristic of lossy formats is that when the material is compressed in any of them, a significant part of the original audio information is irretrievably lost and cannot be restored later in any way. Because of this, a high degree of compression is achieved, while the loss is barely perceptible or even invisible to the ear, as only data that is not critical to human perception is discarded.

Lossless is the generic name for a family of audio formats that use lossless data compression. Typical family members: FLAC, Monkey’s Audio (APE), ALAC, WavPack. Unlike lossy formats, here no information is lost during compression, everything happens in the same way as in normal filing cabinets. Paying for complete data security is a significantly lower compression ratio compared to loss.

Differences between FLAC or MP3 formats, which is better

Differences between FLAC or MP3 formats, which is better

FLAC vs MP3

With the advent of digital technologies in the world of music, the question arose about the choice of methods for digitizing, processing and storing sound. Many formats have been developed, most of which are still used successfully in certain situations. Conventionally, they are all divided into two large groups: lossless audio and lossy audio. Among the former, the FLAC format is in the lead, among the latter, the real monopoly was for MP3. So what are the main differences between FLAC and MP3, and are they really important to the listener?

FLAC vs. MP3

What is FLAC and MP3?

If the audio is recorded in FLAC format or converted to it from another lossless format, the entire frequency spectrum and additional information about the file content (metadata) is saved. The file structure looks like this:

four-byte identification string (FlaC);
Streaminfo metadata (required to configure playback equipment);
other metadata blocks (optional);
audiofrems.
It is common practice to directly record FLAC files while playing “live” music or from vinyl records.

Play music on iPhone

When developing algorithms for compressing MP3 files, the psychoacoustic model of a person was used. In short, during the conversion, those parts of the spectrum that our ears do not perceive or do not perceive completely will be “cut off” from the sound flow. Also, if the stereo broadcasts are similar in certain stages, they can be converted to mono sound. The main criterion for audio quality is the compression ratio – bit rate:

up to 160 kbit / s – low quality, a lot of third-party interference, frequency drops;
160-260 kbps – medium quality, mediocre peak frequency playback;
260-320 kbps – Deep, smooth, high-quality sound with minimal interference.
Sometimes a high bit rate is achieved when converting a low bit rate file. This will not improve the sound quality in any way – files converted from 128 to 320 bps will still sound like a 128-bit file.

Table: Comparison of characteristics and differences between audio formats
FLAC indicator MP3 low bit rate MP3 high bit rate
Lossless lossy compression format
Sound quality high low high
Volume of a song 25-200 Mb 2-5 Mb 4-15 Mb
Appointment listening to music on high-quality audio systems, creating a music file, installing ringtones, storing and playing files on devices with limited memory, home listening to music, storing the catalog on portable devices.

Compatibility PC, some smartphones and tablets, high-end players most electronic devices most electronic devices
To hear the difference between a quality MP3 and FLAC file, you must have an excellent ear for music or an “advanced” audio system. The MP3 format is more than enough for listening to music at home or on the road, and FLAC is still the plethora of musicians, DJs, and audiophiles.

MP3 VS FLAC. How do you hear the difference?

MP3 VS FLAC. How do you hear the difference?

FLAC vs MP3

Along with vinyl records and CDs, our music library is increasingly replenished with MP3 and Flac music files. Many consider these two formats to be irreconcilable enemies, while others are sure that the difference between them is small. Are?

FLAC vs. MP3

About formats.
A little history. The MP3 format (MPEG-1/2 / 2.5 Layer 3) appeared in 1994. Do you remember those days? There was no talk of gigabytes, hundreds of megabytes cost a lot of money and many still remembered the legendary phrase of Bill Gates: “640 KB of memory is enough for any computer”. And if the veracity of this phrase is still questioned, then as early as 94 no one doubted that music would be distributed over the Internet, and the files would be stored on a computer. Okay, keeping your entire music library on one hard drive and being able to take it with you wherever you go is a great idea. However, at that time the main carrier of “digital music” was the CD.

A standard CD contains 650 megabytes or 74 minutes of music at a bit rate of 1411.2 kbps. In order to preserve a dozen albums in pristine quality in the year 94, it was required to have a very solid quantity! Yes, and a personal computer cost a lot then, and the main task of the MP3 that appeared was the ability to transmit sound through channels with little bandwidth. At that time, transferring an entire CD over the Internet required tens of hours at best. Therefore, the developers were faced with the task of reducing the size of the audio file to the maximum, avoiding to a minimum the losses during the compression of the signal. However, the encoding technologies were not yet perfect, and the processors were not that fast, so it was decided to apply the psychoacoustic method, in which only part of the audio information is lost. For example, all “quiet” sounds above 17 kHz and all bass below 40 Hz. The developers have established various levels of compression for such files, taking the digital stream as the basis for measuring the quality: the more information is transmitted per second of time, the higher the sound quality, but also the larger the file size. The maximum bit rate in MP3 is considered to be 320 kbps, in which the sound is balanced and the quality is as close to the original as possible.

And this is the “closest” and tormented to good sound lovers so far. The fact is that listening to music on high-quality equipment allows you to fully feel the difference between the original recording and its MP3 version, even at 320 kbps.

In all honesty, we admit that you can listen to music even at 64 kbps. If you just want to hear your favorite tune, then no obstacle is terrible. You can even play the nearest musical instrument yourself, if you have the skill, or listen through the speaker phone. However, if you want to enjoy a work in which all the inherent nuances and emotions, its interpretation by the sound engineer and the way the performers play, will be preserved, then MP3 (as, indeed, any other format of lossy compression) will. It will not be a joy, as the playback is excellent.Cd recorded and edited on a mediocre device.

The developers of the Flac format thought about how to reproduce high-quality compressed audio in high-quality Hi-Fi. In fact, FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec – “free lossless audio codec”) appeared only 6 years after MP3. However, encoding technologies have come a long way during this time, making it possible to create codecs that compress the audio signal without loss. Of course, it wasn’t possible to make the file smaller than MP3, but users now have an order of magnitude more spacious storage, so a couple hundred megabytes per album is a mere trifle. It is not?

MP3 and FLAC: who wins?

MP3 and FLAC: who wins?

Mp3 & FLAC

Music lovers from all countries have been arguing for many years: is it possible to distinguish a high-quality MP3 from a lossless one in a blind test (FLAC, APE, etc.)? How much does compression loss affect the perception of music? Should you give up MP3? Let’s try to answer these questions.

FLAC vs MP3

A little history
In the early 1990s, experts understood that the future of music was digital. However, hard drives were expensive then and fans preferred to store their music collections on cassettes and CDs. The researchers faced a problem: they needed a suitable format to store records on computers. At the same time, every hundred kilobytes were counted – you can slightly sacrifice quality compared to CDs, but save precious hard drive space.

In the late 1980s, the first functional prototypes of a new lossy compressed audio storage format, MP3, were created. The first publicly available MP3 encoder appeared in 1994, and the first playback software soon followed. The first encoding algorithms made it possible to obtain files with slightly “chopped” high frequencies. The sound quality was not comparable to that of a CD, but the output file sizes were quite acceptable.

In the early 2000s, volumes on hard drives were growing rapidly and other audio formats that provide lossless compression began to appear. Relatively speaking, an audio track of this format can be restored to the original WAV from a lossless CD. Perhaps the most popular lossless compression format was FLAC, introduced in 2001. It is suitable for both storing home audio collections and playing music on professional computers. However, a FLAC file can be 6-10 times heavier than a good quality MP3 (256 or 320 kbps). But does file size and losslessness mean consistently high sound quality?

find 10 differences
Compare, for example, two spectrograms of the same song (DAT ADAM – Hydra 3D): it is easy to see that MP3 “cuts” high frequencies compared to lossless compression (left – MP3 320 kbps, right – FLAC spectrogram, obtained by digitizing CD). But the question is different: will you hear the difference?

A bit of anatomy: The human ear is theoretically capable of hearing sounds from 16 Hz to 20 kHz. However, much depends on the age and individual characteristics of the listener. The author of this article can hear sound with a frequency of 16 kHz, but not 17 kHz and above, but there are adults (25 years and older) who can still perceive 18 kHz. All of these frequencies are quite successfully supported by the MP3 format. If you are exceptionally clear, you will be able to hear some difference in the high frequencies, but the difference is almost subtle for most people.

Flac vs mp3

Flac vs mp3

FLAC vs MP3

Recently, FLAC-compatible players, which are highly appreciated by most audiophiles, have developed rapidly. What is the secret of the format? Why is the popular mp3 format not suitable for music lovers?

Mp3 vs Flac

The birth of mp3

In the early days of digital audio, the first music format was Wave, which was widely used on CD-Audio discs. There were no large hard drives at the time and the 700MB album seemed very large. With the advent of high-performance microcircuits, the mp3 format was invented, allowing music to take up 10 times less disk space (~ 70MB vs. 700MB). This made it possible to significantly increase the number of musical compositions stored by listeners at home on a computer and early Flash players. Due to its high weight, the original format was replaced by the mp3 boom.

Many people remember the incredibly popular iriver players that support mp3 and ogg, but the time for those players has passed and iriver has released Astel & Kern players that support FLAC in high resolution.

Compression of information in mp3 and quality How does mp3 take up less space? It is based on two technologies: archiving and psychoacoustic compression. The conventional file is not very efficient and is only used in lossless formats like flac, ape, and wavepack. Psychoacoustic compression is added to mp3 and this format belongs to the Lossy group (lossy compression).

Psychoacoustic compression dilutes data according to a simple principle: anything that the listener potentially does not hear (for example, quiet sounds against the background of loud sounds) is mercilessly discarded. There are many parallels with the video and the photos. For example, in the jpg format, pixels with similar colors are grouped into large squares of the same color and when forming an image, we usually do not notice that various hues have disappeared. But if we want to take a closer look, we will definitely see it!

The quality of the same mp3 bit rate is different

There are a large number of mp3 encoders, and each has its own priority level in the algorithm, what is least important in music and what to remove first with low compression and last with high. The higher the compression, the more meaningful information is removed and the easier it is to listen to on simple audio equipment.

Unfortunately, the sound quality of mp3 depends not only on the degree of compression expressed in bitrate, but also on the codec with which it was compressed and with what settings. Very often, a high bit rate on the order of 320 kB / s is used, but with the fast and less resource consuming encoding mode. The file encodes very quickly, but as a result, it subjectively sounds worse than encoded at 128 kB / s in long, resource-intensive mode.

Almost all “mp3 producers” in the form of websites and CD compilations use fast algorithms. They believe that most will not hear the difference on their phones anyway, and will be guided by the purchase only by the bitrate. Why spend the extra effort if they buy well?

The differences between the 320 kB / s mp3 encoded in high quality and resource intensive mode and the original Wave are actually very small and sometimes difficult to distinguish even with good audio equipment, but these mp3s are usually very few and far between. they just make them enthusiastic. Most of the mp3 leaves a depressing impression.

Much also depends on the decoder, which determines the quality of the final sound. There are still battles on the forums, which software or hardware player sounds better with which decoder.

At the height of mp3 development, the quality of players and sound cards left much to be desired, especially considering that the main mp3 users were those who could not afford to listen to music on a good hi-fi system. . Quality issues were hardly noticed, similar to JPG compression issues when viewed through a cell phone screen. But on a good audio route, it was obvious. Recently, technology has advanced and the quality of most fonts has increased and consequently the disadvantages of mp3 have become more obvious. What are the main disadvantages of mp3 sound?

The absence or unnaturalness of the high frequencies (due to the strong decimation of the high frequencies, which most supposedly cannot hear)
Wheezing and distortion in vocals, unnatural timbres of instruments
Violation of the location of sources in space.
But most importantly, you never know how high quality an mp3 will sound, how much information is actually lost on it.