is youtube audio quality good Archives

YOUTUBE SOUND QUALITY AND PICTURE QUALITY (AS OF JUNE 2021) Part 2

Free Download Mp4Gain

YOUTUBE SOUND QUALITY AND PICTURE QUALITY (AS OF JUNE 2021) Part 2

YouTube Audio

Video format: VP9
DASH value Video size Video bitrate Comments
278 144p (256 × 144) 100K-300 Kbps Validated in Firefox
330 144p (256 × 144) (Only HDR compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
242 240p (426 × 240) 100K-500 Kbps Validated in Firefox
331 240p (426 × 240) (Only HDR-compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
243 360p (640 × 360) 200K-950 Kbps Validated in Firefox
332 360p (640 × 360) (Only HDR-compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
244 480p (854 x 480) 300K-2 Mbps Validated in Firefox
333 480p (854 x 480) (Only HDR-compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
247 720p (1280 x 720) 30 fps 600K-4.3 Mbps Validated in Firefox
302 720p (1280 x 720) 60 fps 600K-4.3 Mbps Validated in Firefox
334 720p (1280 x 720) (Only HDR compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
248 1080p (1920 × 1080) 30 fps 700K-7 Mbps Validated in Firefox
303 1080p (1920 × 1080) 60 fps 700K-7 Mbps Validated in Firefox
335 1080p (1920 x 1080) (Only HDR compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
271 1440p (2560 × 1440) 30 fps 3.5 M-13 Mbps Validated in Firefox
308 1440p (2560 × 1440) 60 fps 3.5 M-13 Mbps Validated in Firefox
336 1440p (2560 x 1440) (Only HDR compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
313 2160p (3840 × 2160) 30 fps 5.7 M-37 Mbps Validated in Firefox
315 2160p (3840 × 2160) 60 fps 5.7 M-37 Mbps Validated in Firefox
337 2160p (3840 x 2160) (Only HDR compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
272 4320p (7680 × 4320) 10 M-50 Mbps Validated in Firefox
Video format: AV1
AV1 is an open source video compression format called AOMedia Video 1. Since it is a codec in development as a successor standard to VP9, it seems that VP9 videos will eventually be replaced by AV1, but it will take time to replace them because the only supported browsers currently are Chrome and Firefox. .

Postscript 2020/4/23: Confirmed to apply to some videos.
When applied, the DASH value will be as follows
av01.0.05M.08 (398) / opus (251)

DASH value Video size Video bitrate Comments
394 144p (256 × 144) is not clear Validated in Firefox
395 240p (426 × 240) is not clear Validated in Firefox
396 360p (640 × 360) is not clear Validated in Firefox
397 480p (854 x 480) is not clear Validated in Firefox
398 720p (1280 x 720) is not clear Validated in Firefox
399 1080p (1920 x 1080) is not clear Validated in Firefox
571 4320p (7680 × 4320) is not clear Validated in Firefox
Audio
Audio format: AAC-LC
DASH value Audio bit rate Cutoff frequency Comments
36 not clear not clear Can’t verify because iPhone 7 has no headphone output
18 96 Kbps 15 kHz Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
Twenty-two 128 Kbps 15.8 kHz Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
139 96 Kbps 15 kHz Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
140 128 Kbps 15.8 kHz Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
Same for AAC = 139 (96 Kbps) 18

Same for AAC = 140 (128 Kbps) 22

Audio format: Opus
Since the Opus audio bit rate is a variable bit rate (VBR), the average value is displayed. It will increase up to about 2 times.

DASH value Audio bit rate Cutoff frequency Comments
249 48 Kbps (VBR) 20 kHz Validated in Firefox
250 64 Kbps (VBR) 20 kHz Validated in Firefox
251 128 Kbps (VBR) 20 kHz Validated in Firefox
Opus = 249 (48 Kbps)

Opus = 250 (64 Kbps)

Opus = 251 (128 Kbps)

Postscript 2020/2/11: It looks like Opus audio was finally created for all users’ videos.

Please refer to the article linked above for how to upload in high quality.

To check after upload, right click on the video about a day after upload, click “Detailed Statistics” and check the value of “Codecs”.
At this time, be sure to use a browser other than “Safari”. Safari is not compatible with Opus.

Success story: Codecs vp09.00.51.08.01.01.01.01 (243) / opus (251)
Failure example: Codecs avc1.4d401e (134) /mp4a.40.2 (140)
The video / audio codecs are listed in order. (In this case, the video is vp9 (243), so it is 360p in WebM format, and the audio is Opus (251), so it is 128Kbps video in Opus format.)

Depending on the video, more than 30 videos can be generated in one video.

● YouTube app
Click here to download the app
ANDROID IOS

Version “15.20.33” or later updated on May 14,
2020 (strictly speaking, it will apply approximately from May 23, 2020)

Now it is compatible with Opus audio. (Android compatible devices only)

Free Download Mp4Gain

Mp4Gain Main Window

Mp4Gain Features

Free Download Mp4Gain

YOUTUBE SOUND QUALITY AND PICTURE QUALITY (AS OF JUNE 2021)

YouTube Audio

This time, I investigated the sound quality and image quality of “YouTube”.

youtube audio

HOW TO UPLOAD TO YOUTUBE WITH HIGH QUALITY SOUND

Basically YouTube uses “H.264 AAC-LC” or “Opus” as the audio codec.
The video codec used is “H.264” (MP4) or “VP9” (WebM). “AV1” is also used in some videos.

Verification method
(Video) Download the official video of “3D Youtube Downloader”, upload the video to “VLC Media Player” and refer to Media Information → Input Bit Rate in Statistics.
(Audio) Check the audio of the video downloaded by the above method using “foobar2000” for the bit rate. The cutoff frequency is converted to .wav format by “XMedia Recode”, and the file is imported into “WaveSpectra” and verified.

● PC
The PC version of YouTube ranges from 144p (320 x 180) to 4K (3860 x 2160), but there are differences in the image quality that can be selected and the audio that can be played depending on the browser.
You can check if your browser supports it on the next page.
YOUTUBE SUPPORT BROWSER

The following is the support status for each browser (browsers that support both VP9 and MP4 have the highest picture and sound quality).

Browser name PIN
Internet Explorer (Windows7) Not supported (not visible)
Incompatible iOS Safari
Internet Explorer (Windows 8.1 / 10) Only compatible with MP4 (not viewable)
Safari on Macintosh Only compatible with MP4
Microsoft Edge （EdgeHTML） Correspondence (depending on model)
Microsoft Edge （Chrome） Correspondence
Firefox Correspondence
Google Chrome (recommended browser) Correspondence
Correspondence table by DASH browser
* We are looking for information. Provide information in the comment section.

Recommended browser
YouTube Help from
> YouTube video is available to view in a variety of formats and resolutions. However, some browsers do not support the new video format. Depending on your browser, you may only have one or two video formats to choose from. We recommend that you update your browser or operating system to enjoy watching the video comfortably.

The following is an example of a browser and operating system combination that supports the video format for high-quality YouTube videos.

Google Chrome (all operating systems)
MS Edge
Safari (Mac OS X 10.10 or later)
Firefox (Windows 7 or later and Mac OS X 10.10 or later)
* Internet Explorer is no longer supported.

Video and Audio DASH Correspondence Table
[Caution] In the following table, only those whose use is currently confirmed are listed. Therefore, not all configurations are listed.

Photography
Since the video bit rate is a variable bit rate (VBR), the upper and lower limits are listed. The mean value is somewhere in the middle.

Image format: MP4
DASH value Video size Video bitrate Comments
36 240p (426 × 240) is not clear Validated with Safari on iOS14 (mp4v.20.3, mp4a.40.2)
18 360p (640 × 360) 500K-1 Mbps Validated with Safari on iOS14 (avc1.42001E, mp4a.40.2)
22 720p (1280 × 720) 1-3 Mbps Validated with Safari on iOS14 (avc1.64001F, mp4a.40.2)
160 144p (256 × 144) 50K-90 Kbps Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
133 240p (426 × 240) 150K-580 Kbps Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
134 360p (640 × 360) 200K-1 Mbps Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
135 480p (854 × 480) 250K-2.3 Mbps Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
136 720p (1280 × 720) 30 fps 300K-4.4 Mbps Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
298 720p (1280 × 720) 60 fps 300K-4.4 Mbps Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
137 1080p (1920 × 1080) 30 fps 500K-6.2Mbps Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
299 1080p (1920 × 1080) 60 fps 500K-6.2Mbps Validated with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10
Image form: VP9
DASH value Video size Video bitrate Comments
278 144p (256 × 144) 100K-300 Kbps Validated in Firefox
330 144p (256 × 144) (Only HDR compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
242 240p (426 × 240) 100K-500 Kbps Validated in Firefox
331 240p (426 × 240) (Only HDR-compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
243 360p (640 × 360) 200K-950 Kbps Validated in Firefox
332 360p (640 × 360) (Only HDR-compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
244 480p (854 × 480) 300K-2 Mbps Validated in Firefox
333 480p (854 × 480) (Only HDR-compatible terminals can be selected) Validated with Google Pixel 4
247 720p (1280 × 720) 30 fps 600K-4.3

SOUND QUALITY: A NEW APPROACH TO HARDWARE TESTING

SOUND QUALITY: A NEW APPROACH TO HARDWARE TESTING

Audio Equipment Quality

We all know well that the choice of audio equipment is not easy, because even within the same price category, different models differ markedly in sound. Now nobody is surprised by the fact that before buying an audio component, a consumer wants to know, in addition to passport data, the opinion of a competent expert on it and even timidly tries to “taste” its sound himself. AUDIO EQUIPMENT QUALITY

Why is there a need for “tasting” equipment, whereas most industrial products, such as irons, light bulbs, refrigerators, do not need to be “tasted”? It would not occur to anyone to ask the seller to provide an expert opinion on the quality of ironing with a new model of iron. It is enough for you to know how much energy it consumes, how much it weighs and what comforts it offers. However, let us remember that the manufacturers of hi-fi equipment in the early 1970s, deliberately trying to draw an analogy between audio equipment and plates, were actively introducing a set of technical requirements for gentlemen into the minds of consumers [ 1] that supposedly guarantee a high quality of sound of the equipment. But manufacturers of audio equipment, which relied only on objective parameters, were already called objectivists – in the late 1970s, disappointment awaited. The sales volume of the equipment they produced began to fall steadily, and this despite the fact that the objective parameters were constantly improving. This trend can be called target parameter inflation. Inflation was expressed in the fact that the number of zeros after the decimal point in the values of harmonic distortion, coefficient of intermodulation distortion, unevenness of frequency response, amplifier output impedance, etc. grew, while the sound quality of audio equipment not only did not improve, but it worsened significantly. This deterioration gave impetus to the mass movement of subjectivists. Their motto was: “If there are contradictions between objective parameters and subjective evaluations, then the results of objective measurements should not be taken into account” [2]. It was the subjectivists who then challenged the audio design engineers: “The physical effects that degrade the sound quality of amplifiers are not detected in objective measurements because they are not known to orthodox engineering science.” * 1 Such statements surprised many “old school” audio engineers. A fierce controversy arose on the pages of the newspapers. This controversy was started by Paul Messenger in September 1976 * Hi-Fi News. He made a fairly weighted statement by today’s standards that in the future the evaluation of the quality of audio equipment will become almost completely subjective and that although auditory perception may fail us, it is nevertheless the most sensitive instrument for evaluating sound. . Such statements surprised many “old school” audio engineers. A fierce controversy arose on the pages of the newspapers. This controversy was started by Paul Messenger in September 1976 * Hi-Fi News. He made a fairly weighted statement by today’s standards that in the future the evaluation of the quality of audio equipment will become almost completely subjective and that although auditory perception may fail us, it is nevertheless the most sensitive instrument for evaluating sound. . Such statements surprised many “old school” audio engineers. A fierce controversy arose on the pages of the newspapers. This controversy was started by Paul Messenger in September 1976 * Hi-Fi News. He made a fairly weighted statement by today’s standards that in the future the evaluation of the quality of audio equipment will become almost completely subjective and that although auditory perception may fail us, it is nevertheless the most sensitive instrument for evaluating sound. .
The victory of the subjectivists over the objectivists became evident. To commemorate this victory, the highest quality and most expensive equipment was called “high end”.
High-end shopping has become a ritual reminiscent of the cult. The appearance of the stores was now markedly different from the stores that sold hi-fi equipment “in bulk”, and the customer service was completely different. The buyer of the audio equipment was left alone with the seller-audio expert and, at the same time, with a hypnotist in a room specially equipped to conduct a suggestion session, the so-called listening room. Tapestries, overstuffed armchairs, ghostly light *: it all led to auditory hypnosis.