WAV, FLAC and more: the best audio formats for your music


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture

WAV vs FLAC

What audio format is best for music? Image: What audio format is best for music? Image: Unsplash
AAC is not the size of a battery, nor is FLAC an anti-aircraft weapon. With these and many other abbreviations, we find ourselves in the dense jungle of audio formats. In this guide, we’ll explain what these abbreviations mean, what each music file format is for, and which one is the best to use in your music collection.

WAV vs AIFF vs ALAC

Lossless uncompressed audio formats
In uncompressed audio formats, the analog source material was converted to a lossless digital format. Uncompressed and lossless means no information was lost during the transfer and you get the best possible sound quality, at the expense of storage space, of course.

PCM
PCM stands for Pulse-Code Modulation and represents a digital image of the raw audio signal. Since analog sound is in wave form, it must be “sampled” at certain intervals (pulses). This results in the sample rate (frequency in Hertz) and the bit rate (number of bits per sample). PCM is an uncompressed, lossless audio format that is closest to analog source.

Usage: Music Industry: Basis for Lossless Uncompressed Audio Formats

Wav
WAV (Waveform Audio File Format) is a standard developed by Microsoft and IBM in 1991 for various audio formats. This waveform audio file format is actually a file container that generally contains uncompressed audio signals in PCM format, allowing Windows and Mac systems to process them more easily.

The result is excellent sound quality, but also very high storage space requirements. Another disadvantage of the WAV format is that only rudimentary metadata (artist, album, song title) is available and can be saved. You cannot store an album cover, for example.

Use: Music CD, among others

TAD D1000mk2
The TAD D1000 MK2 can play SACD and thus reproduce high-resolution audio signals. | Image: TAD
AIFF
The AIFF (Audio Interchange File Format) was developed by Apple in 1988 and is Apple’s equivalent to the WAV container. Similar to this, AIFF can contain different audio formats and is populated with the PCM format by default.

Use: Apple systems

Lossless compressed audio formats
Those who do not want to produce CDs or have an infinite amount of storage space can switch to high resolution audio formats. They are used for Super Audio CD (SACD) and streaming services like Tidal and, thanks to very good codecs, they provide lossless compression.

DSD
DSD (Direct Stream Digital) follows a similar principle to PCM, but works differently. The DSD codec uses fewer bits at a much higher sample rate to reduce the storage space required for a music file.

Usage: super audio CD

FLAC
FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) is considered a very good alternative to WAV. The format requires up to 50 percent less storage space and can store more metadata. This makes FLAC a popular format for the highest quality music downloads, but with the downside that it is not compatible with Apple’s iTunes.

Usage: Hi-Res Music Downloads for Standalone Apple Systems

A THE C
As is often the case, Apple has also developed its own alternative called ALAC (Apple Lossless Audio Codec). FLAC is considered the more efficient of the two formats, but with ALAC Apple users can also enjoy a lossless audio format.

Usage: High-resolution music downloads for Apple systems

MQA
Unlike the other formats, MQA (Master Quality Authenticated) is not a real audio format, but a codec system consisting of an encoder and a decoder. Behind this is a complex piece of software that, according to the developer, should be able to reproduce the original master quality of the studio.


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture


Mp4Gain Main Window
picture


Mp4Gain Features
picture


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture

WMA Lossless vs FLAC

Lossless audio compression comes in a variety of forms. By definition, since all of these formats are lossless, technically there should be no difference in audio quality between them. The significant difference lies in the way they are compressed, which some say affects audio quality in different ways. WMA and FLAC files have some advantages and disadvantages, depending on the context.

WMA

WMA Lossless format

The Windows Media Audio format is one of several common lossless formats out there. It was originally designed to compete with the MP3 format, which lacks the full digital rights management capabilities of the WMA format. It is comparable to other proprietary lossless formats in its ability to support multi-channel audio and high-resolution recordings. WMA uses a unique compression algorithm that is sometimes claimed to provide better quality audio than other lossless formats. However, since “lossless” is by definition an identical reproduction of an original source, the superiority of the WMA format is questionable.

FLAC

FLAC format

The free lossless audio codec was originally created by Josh Coalson in 2000 and has since become a common format in lossless audio playback. Like the Apple Lossless format, the FLAC format is open source and can be used and expanded as desired. The tools for creating and editing FLAC files are freely available. A major limitation of the format is its lack of compatibility with many proprietary digital audio devices and applications. However, support for the FLAC format has grown considerably, especially in the area of ​​audio transmission.

Proprietary and open source

The most significant difference between the WMA and FLAC formats is their use, or lack thereof, of digital rights management technology. WMA is a proprietary format owned by Microsoft and requires a license to implement it. Despite this limitation, it is among the most popular codecs in use and can be played with a wide variety of devices and applications. The FLAC format has the advantage of being freely available for use, but the widespread presence of the WMA format is lacking. The preferred format will always depend on the context in which the file will be used.

Audio quality

Technically, all lossless audio codecs should offer identical audio qualities. However, it is occasionally argued that the different compression methods used result in subtle differences. The WMA codec uses two types of compression on a single file, depending on the complexity of the audio it contains. The result is less compression on complex passages and more compression on less complex regions, said to provide smoother quality than the other codecs. The FLAC compression algorithm is much simpler and compresses all audio files in the same way. If this results in a difference in the quality of the WMA codec, it is probably not detectable by the human ear.