sample rate preamp Archives

Everything you need to know about samples and bits

Free Download Mp4Gain

I started delving into depth and sample rate in my last mixing / mastering tutorial, and while we’re not necessarily digital audio engineers, some background on what bit depth and sample rate is good information for anyone. participate in digital music. It’s something you always work with, whether you know it or not, and it’s great background information for understanding whether understanding the building blocks of digital audio is critical for personal gain or just to be able to sound smart just in case. where the conversation never comes up.

Samplerate

So the first thing to understand is that bit depth and sample rate only exist in digital audio. In digital audio, bit depth describes amplitude (vertical axis) and sample rate describes frequency (horizontal axis). So when we increase the number of bits we are using we are increasing the amplitude resolution of our sound and by increasing the number of samples per second we are using we are increasing the frequency resolution of our sound.

In an analog system (and in nature), the audio is continuous and fluid. In a digital system, the smooth analog waveform is only approximated by the samples and must be set to a limited number of amplitude values. When you sample a sound, the audio is divided into small sections (samples) and these samples are fixed at one of the available amplitude levels. The process of fixing the signal to an amplitude level is called quantization, and the process of creating the sample slices is, of course, called sampling.

In the diagram below you can see a visualization of this where there is an organic sine wave playing for one second. It starts in 0 seconds and ends in 1 second. The blue bars represent the digital approximation of the sine wave where each bar is a sample and has been set to one of the available amplitude levels. (This diagram is obviously much grosser than in real life).

samplerate

This second of audio would have 44.1K, 48K, etc. samples. From left to right depending on the selected sample rate when recording and it will cover -144dB at 0dB at 24bit (or -96dB at 0dB at 16bit bit). The dynamic range resolution (the number of possible amplitude levels for the sample to rest) would be 65,536 at 16 bits, and get this, 16,777,216 when logged at 24 bits.

Therefore, increasing the bit depth greatly increases our amplitude resolution and dynamic range. What is not so obvious is where the increase in dynamic range occurs. The added dB is added to the softest part of the sound since the amplitude can never exceed 0 dB. What this does is allow you to hear more delicate sounds (like a reverb tail running at -130 dB) to be heard, which might otherwise be cut off to a 16-bit, -96 dB sample.

Free Download Mp4Gain

Mp4Gain Main Window

Mp4Gain Features

Free Download Mp4Gain

Sample rate, all about sample rate

For many years it was thought that the sample rate or sampling frequency did not decisively influence the final quality of the digital audio; There are currently several engineers who record in 44.1K or 48K without really knowing why they do it. With the advent of new and better computers, interfaces, ports and protocols, 88.2K, 96K and up to 192K entered the discussion table on the best sample rate to use. It has always been the subject of discussion between engineers and audiophiles; some argued that they did hear the difference between different sample rates and others that did not, and the topic has been subjected to millions of A / B tests with very high quality equipment, causing all kinds of opinions found and uncompromising, fights and friendships of years broken.

While this is a basic issue of digital audio, it is always surrounded by a halo of mystery, mysticism and magic (like every sound theme), which is well worth clarifying.

What is the sample rate?

This topic, although it occurs in the first or second class of digital audio, is not always understood correctly. In scholastic thinking, sample rate is defined as the amount of audio samples transported and taken per second. Since this is a unit of measurement over a second and with events that occur cyclically, the Hertz (1 / Frequency) is used as a unit. Obviously we cannot talk about this subject without referring to the Nyquist sampling theorem, which was tested by Shannon almost twenty years after its publication and in which it is stated that for a limited bandwidth (B) signal (for example, a vibraphone reaches 14.917Hz), the sampling frequency must be twice its bandwidth (2 * B). Then, taking the previous example, we can say that: 2 * B → 2 * 14.917Hz → The sampling frequency for 14.917Hz should be 29.834Hz. This would be equivalent to 29,834 samples per second (1/29, 834) to be able to regenerate the signal of a vibraphone without error. Hence, it is taken that the highest frequency that the human being listens to is 20kHz and if we apply Nyquist it should be 40kHz, but it takes 44.1kHz to meet the demanding ears and for a matter of multiples.

44.1K or 48K to 88.2K or 96K, the correct division

At the dawn of the digital audio era, Nyquist was used to use the sampling resolution of 44.1K, used at that time audio CD format that played at 16bit / 44.1kHz. With the advent of DVD and Blu Ray as video and audio formats, resolutions such as 24Bits / 48K or 24Bits / 96kHz began to be used. Although for many years there were recordings that were made in 24Bits / 88.2kHz or 24Bits / 96kHz, at a certain time of mastering, before sending it to the disk duplicator, the audio suffered a mutilation that reduced it to 16Bits / 44.1kHz as It was ordered by the CD format. This process should be carried out with equipment specially designed for this function and in stages so that the audio did not suffer a very noticeable cut and the bad conversion was evidenced. Although the old and dear Dither was applied since then to compensate for this process (something like “grain” in the cinema. Watch a film without “grain” and it will look like HD even though it was filmed in 1980 on tape and goes to notice until the makeup of the actor and the assembly of the special effects, something otherwise disagreeable).

Generally, to prevent the audio from mutilating or applying several conversions that degrade it, it was decided at what resolution to record before pressing the REC button (we will not mention those that come down directly with your DAW from 24Bits / 96kHz to 16Bits / 44.1kHz in one step to export the audio … there is a place reserved especially for them in hell). If the audio was going to end on CD, a sample rate of 88.2kHz was generally applied, since at the time of mastering, with the symmetrical re-sampling at “half”, it was at 44.1kHz.

Sounds better?

The subjective point of this is that we expect recordings to “sound” better at a higher sample rate. The reality is that if we record in high sample rates, with very good sampling, our sound will not “sound better”, but will be more detailed. Obviously, if our sound source is bad, our microphones and preamps too and so on, no matter how much we record at 192K, the result will not be the best. Now, if we use a good sound source, good audio chain and a good converter, everything will be obviously good. But don’t confuse; We are talking about detail here, not if it will sound more “warm,” “fat,” or “full-bodied.” This translates into a more homogeneous capture of the entire frequency spectrum, both audible and non-audible.