Surround sound battle is fierce


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture

Surround sound battle is fierce

High-Res

Apple’s goal of betting on “spatial audio”, not lossless or high resolution

Hi-Res Audio

Apple’s “Apple Music” finally supports Hi-Res Audio, Lossless Audio, and Spatial Audio. First, let’s review the content

of this ad. First of all, it is important that all the songs in the catalog, some 75 million songs, are not lossy. Lossless normal sound quality can be selected from 44.1 kHz / 16 bit to 48 kHz / 24 bit. It also offers lossless high resolution of up to 192 kHz / 24-bit.

Furthermore, it revealed that it will distribute spatial audio using Dolby Atmos on Apple Music. Spatial audio is an immersive surround technology that Apple has been developing little by little for some time. Compatible with iPhone, iPad, Mac built-in speakers, and AirPods Pro / AirPods Max.

We will add this many new services at once starting in June, but the price will remain unchanged and the monthly fee will be 980 yen (for the regular plan). Personally, what surprised me the most was this behavior on a large scale.

■ Spatial audio is the “next dimension of audio”

By the way, among these new services, Apple’s strongest launch was not high resolution or lossless, but spatial audio with Dolby Atmos. When looking at press release titles, spatial audio comes first and then all catalogs are lossless.

If you show roughly the degree of stress on each track in proportion, it would be roughly 60% for spatial audio, 30% for lossless audio, and roughly 10% for high resolution. No, the high resolution may be lower. In the press release, it was only mentioned as a bonus, and I feel a bit lonely as a person involved in audio-related media.

At the same time, the promotional video released within the Apple Music app also makes spatial audio + Dolby Atmos a huge draw as “the next dimension of audio after stereo.”

Apple Music already has a promotional video for spatial audio

The songs corresponding to spatial audio + Dolby Atmos have been announced as “thousands of songs” when they are released in June. It is said that it will steadily increase after that, but the absolute number is still small.

On the other hand, lossless support covers all titles of around 75 million songs. In general, this has a greater impact on general users. And even more so because there is no additional cost.

It seems unnatural to heavily appeal to spatial audio, but it makes sense given the corresponding hardware and other conditions.

■ New AirPods do not

announced There was a rumor that the new AirPods will be announced at the same time as the new Apple Music service this time. If the rumors were correct, I also wrote a column on how to achieve lossless audio and Hi-Res Audio streaming to AirPods.

But this time, the new AirPods weren’t announced. Bluetooth streaming to existing AirPods is the same as before, and no new technology has emerged that takes advantage of high-quality, lossless sound. If you limit it to playback on iPhone + AirPods, there should be little benefit from the absence of losses.

Not that much. If you use Apple Music on your Android smartphone, there is a high chance that you can play high quality sound with LDAC or aptX HD compatible smartphones and headphones. It will bother sending salt to smartphones, headphones, and helmets made by other companies.

In the future, Apple believes that it is very possible that it will create a new technology to transmit lossless sound quality and launch AirPods with it, but so far nothing has been seen.

■ Spatial audio enhances the value of AirPods

On the other hand, for spatial audio, many of Apple’s flagship products such as AirPods and Beats earphones / headphones equipped with H1 or W1 chips, and the latest iPhone, iPad and Mac integrated speakers are used for playback.

In particular, the point is that spatial audio can be used with headphones / earphones equipped with the W1 chip. Until now, AirPods Pro or AirPods Max equipped with the H1 chip were required to reproduce spatial audio, but this time, the compatible headphones will expand to the first AirPods equipped with the W1 chip at the same time.

Of course, Apple will want to increase the profitability of Apple Music alone, but AirPods should be overwhelmingly bigger as a business. Some speculate that AirPods sales reached $ 12 billion in 2019. Increasing the added value would be judged to contribute to the overall profit expansion.

Also, when considering the future, it is important to promote spatial audio + Dolby Atmos.


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture


Mp4Gain Main Window
picture


Mp4Gain Features
picture


Free Download Mp4Gain
picture

What is high resolution?

What is high resolution?

“HiRes Audio”

High Resolution Sound Source is an abbreviation for “High Resolution Audio” and is defined as high quality sound source data with more information than a CD.

High-Res Audio

* 1 The
Music recorded in the studio is recorded by cutting a portion of the data to burn to a CD.
Since the high-resolution sound source is a sound source that records the recorded data as is without cutting it, you can experience the atmosphere of the studio and even the breath of the artist.
High-resolution audio sources can be downloaded from a dedicated distribution site or purchased as data saved to a USB stick, DVD, etc.

Difference between CD sound source and high resolution sound source
High resolution sound source file format
Enjoying a High-Resolution Sound Source

Difference between CD sound source and high resolution sound source
Now, I will explain the specific difference in the “amount of information” between a CD sound source and a high resolution sound source.
Music files, such as CD sound sources and high-resolution sound sources, are digitized original signals (analog sound sources).
This job is created using the “sampling” and “quantization” steps, and its values ​​are expressed in units of “sample rate (Hz)” and “number of quantization bits (bit)”.

“Sampling” that determines the width of the range
“Sampling” is expressed by the number of times the original signal is digitized in one second.
In the case of a CD, it means that you are recording at a speed of 44.1 kHz = 44,100 Hz per second, that is, 44,100 times (Fig. 1).
When it comes to high-resolution audio sources, the sample rate increases, so more data can be collected (Fig. 2).

“Quantization” that determines the fineness of the volume
The “quantization” digitizes the changes in the volume of the sound and, in the case of a CD, the original signal is decomposed into 16 bits (2 to the 16th power = 65,536) and recorded (Fig. 3).
If this number of bits is low, small sounds will be treated as noise, but as the number of bits increases, details will be reproduced exactly as “sound” (Fig. 4).

Reproducibility determined by “sampling” x “quantification”
The results of combining the vertical “sampling” line and the horizontal “quantizing” line are shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6. By comparing the CD sound source (Fig. 5) and the sound source high resolution (Fig. 6), it is evident that the high resolution sound source has a curve closer to the current signal.
In this way, the higher the sample rate and the number of quantization bits, the higher the sound quality of the original song in the studio and the more realistic and airy it can be expressed on a CD.

High resolution sound source file format
Now, I will explain the specific difference in the “amount of information” between a CD sound source and a high resolution sound source.
Music files, such as CD sound sources and high-resolution sound sources, are digitized original signals (analog sound sources).
This job is created using the “sampling” and “quantization” steps, and its values ​​are expressed in units of “sample rate (Hz)” and “number of quantization bits (bit)”.

WAV if you are interested in sound quality, FLAC if you also want convenience
WAV is an advantageous format in terms of sound quality because it converts the sound source into data without compressing it. However, consequently, the data capacity will be very large.
Also, you cannot write metadata such as cover photos and artist names.
FLAC, on the other hand, is called lossless compression, which applies compression processing when converting data, but is a mechanism for playing while restoring the original sound source state during viewing.
Therefore, the data capacity can be reduced to about half that of WAV.
Generally, it is said that there is no change in sound quality due to compression / restoration, but there is an opinion that the WAV (uncompressed) sound source sounds better because there are fewer processing steps.
It is also attractive that FLAC can write metadata such as cover photos and even display lyrics.

We recommend buying WAV if you are interested in sound quality and FLAC if you are also looking for convenience. However, a specific player application is required to play high-resolution audio sources.

What is high resolution sound source and high resolution support?

What is high resolution sound source and high resolution support?

Hi-Res AUDIO

Easy to understand explanation of “meaning and difference”

High-Resolution Audio

The word “high resolution” is often found in new audio-related products, such as digital audio players and headphones. What does it show exactly? Is it possible to hear high resolution with the minicomponent system that I am using now? Let me explain the basics to you. At the same time, let’s introduce Sony’s high-resolution headphones and earphones, as well as recommended players.
High resolution means “high quality equipment and sound source”
“High Resolution” is an abbreviation for “High Resolution Audio”.
Translated into Japanese, it means “high definition, high resolution audio”, but if you roughly correct it in an easy-to-understand way, it is not a mistake to think that it is audio with a higher sound quality than above.

Audio is enjoyed by combining a device (hardware) for playback and a sound source (software) that is the music itself, but there are devices that support high resolution and sound sources recorded in high resolution.

Since the word high resolution itself is almost synonymous with “high sound quality”, it is difficult to understand the range that will be displayed, but many of today’s audio devices have a high resolution logo and you can tell at a glance which is a compatible high resolution product …

This is the high resolution definition decided by the Japan Audio Association, which is an industry group, that is, the logo displayed on audio equipment that meets the required specifications.
If you choose a product with this high resolution logo, you can enjoy high resolution.

This high-resolution logo is displayed on audio equipment that meets the definition set by the Japan Audio Association and serves as a guide for product selection.
This high-resolution logo is displayed on audio equipment that meets the definition set by the Japan Audio Association and serves as a guide for product selection.

Specifically, a digital device, such as a player, can play a WAV / FLAC sound source with a sample rate (sample rate) of 96 kHz or higher and a quantization bit rate of 24-bit or higher.
Since this is the minimum standard, some logo acquisition products cover even higher levels, such as 192 kHz / 24-bit support and 384 kHz / 24-bit support.

High resolution with higher sound quality than a CD
The sample rate and the number of quantization bits are originally numerical values ​​that indicate the “fineness” when converting an analog “sound” digitally, and it can be considered that the higher these numbers, the higher the sound quality.

A CD is an easy-to-understand comparison target.
The standard for CD is 44.1 kHz / 16 bit. In other words, it is easy to think that high resolution, requiring 96 kHz / 24-bit or higher, is audio with a sound quality superior to that of a CD.

Of course, in order to enjoy a high resolution, it is necessary that “the sound source is also recorded in high resolution.”
It is possible to play sound sources other than high resolution, but the sound quality is basically the same as non-high resolution. Currently, Hi-Res Audio sources can be purchased through Music Distribution.

How to play “high resolution sound source” using a PC?

How to play “high resolution sound source” using a PC?

Hi-Res audio

What type of audio equipment do you use when listening to music at home?

Until a long time ago, it could have been a component stereo or CD / MD radio cassette player, but today, I believe that music data is often imported to mobile players like PC and iPhone / iPod for listening. So this time, I would like to introduce you to how to play “high resolution sound sources” that make it easier to listen to higher quality music on a PC. When I say “hi-res playback on a PC”, I feel like some difficult adjustments are required, but now the threshold is not that high and high-quality music can be easily played with simple devices. (* Of course, if you try to master it all, the equipment will be expensive and a bit difficult story will turn out …) Here, basically, aiming at those who want to play “high resolution sound source” on a PC for the first time . I will speak from the beginning. Regarding high-resolution audio sources, the first column, “What is a high-resolution audio source that brings sound quality close to recording quality?” I would appreciate if you could read. First of all, why not experience superior sound quality than CDs on your regular computer?

Equipment required to reproduce “high resolution sound sources” with a PC

This is a system that inputs analog audio signals from a USB DAC (mainly stationary type) to an amplifier with an RCA cable and outputs them from a speaker. If the USB DAC has a built-in amplifier, it is possible to bypass the amplifier (see connection example 2).

To play high-bit / high-sample high-resolution audio sources on a PC, there are some devices that need to be freshly prepared. That is the device named USB DAC (Yuesubi Daku) in Connection Example 1. This is a device that has the function of converting a digital signal output from a PC via USB cable into an analog signal (D / A conversion) and has a great effect on the sound quality. Currently, in addition to basic functions such as USB DAC, each manufacturer sells various products, such as those with built-in amplifiers (including headphone amplifiers) and products that can perform A / D as well as D / A, The price is widely sold from various thousands of yen to more than one million yen.

Also, to audition with headphones / earphones only as in connection example 2, you can use a portable headphone amplifier (Potaan) with a USB DAC function to build a simple and compact high-resolution playback system. With this system, you can enjoy high-resolution audio sources even on the go. See also the following columns for Potaan and headphones / earphones.

Why do you need a USB DAC?

So why do we need a USB DAC? Many PCs on the market today are equipped with a device called a “sound card (chip)” that converts D / A digital signals to produce sound from the built-in speakers. However, most of them only support sample rate / bit conversion up to CD quality (16 bit / 44.1 kHz). In other words, even if you play the “high resolution sound source” as it is on a PC, it will degrade to the level of CD quality and output, and will not be able to fully bring out the appeal of the high resolution sound source.

To avoid this, the appeal of high-resolution sound sources is achieved by taking a digital audio signal out of the PC’s USB port via a USB cable and sending the signal to a USB DAC capable of bit D / A conversion. high / high sampling You can reproduce the sound that is extracted. Also, many noise-causing devices are installed inside the PC. Therefore, it is possible to convert the signal with lower noise by performing a D / A conversion externally.

There are devices that have the same functionality as the previous one, but they are compatible with interfaces such as FireWire and Thunderbolt that are used in Mac, but not so many, and USB is now common. You can also enjoy high-resolution sound sources by substituting the audio interface used for recording in place of the USB DAC, but many products have a telephone or XLR terminal as the output terminal and connect to a general audio amplifier. You need to convert it to an RCA terminal.

What is the “high resolution audio” you often hear on music devices? What are the benefits? [Explanation]

What is the “high resolution audio” you often hear on music devices? What are the benefits? [Explanation]

High-resolution audio

More and more music players, headphones, earphones, and recently televisions and sound bars (speakers with amplifiers) claim to support “high-resolution audio.”

Hi-Res Audio

What exactly is “high resolution” on these sound devices? What are the benefits of Hi-Res Audio when listening to music?

“High resolution” was originally a personal computer term

The word “resolution” may have come to the fore, but high resolution was originally a term used to indicate that a computer can display a screen with a screen resolution (pixels / dot count) higher than the system standard.

The old personal computer had 640 x 400 pixels for the NEC “PC-9800 series” (now the NEC personal computer), and 640 x 480 pixels for the “PC / AT compatible”, which is the source of most of the current personal computers. It was a standard resolution. A personal computer equipped with a graphics (drawing) function that can display resolutions higher than these resolutions was called a “high-resolution personal computer.”

Currently, high resolution displays such as Full HD (1920 x 1080 pixels) and 4K (3840 x 2160 pixels) have become “natural” instead of HD (1280 x 720 pixels / 1366 x 768 pixels), so the screen resolution. “High resolution” as a term for “” has become a dead word indeed.

High resolution
A catalog excerpt from the factory “FC-H98 Model 100” personal computer that was once sold by NEC. You can see the word “high resolution mode” (Source: NEC)
commercial

The “high resolution” in sound devices is “more than a CD”
“High resolution” in sound devices is simply used as a term for sound quality that exceeds that of music CDs or DATs (digital audio tapes).

In a digitized sound source, the “sample rate” (unit: kHz), which indicates how many times a second is sampled (sample metering) when digitizing analog audio, and the “quantum”, which indicates the amount of information contained in that of the signal. the number of digitized bits (unit: bits) greatly affects sound quality. Specifically, the sample rate affects the “expressible range (pitch range)”, and the number of quantization bits affects the “volume and fineness of the sound”.

Compare the difference between bit, khz and kbps! High resolution doesn’t make sense? Part 2

Compare the difference between bit, khz and kbps! High resolution doesn’t make sense? Part 2

High Resolution Audio

If it is less than bit or kHz, it will not be high resolution.

High-Resolution Audio

However, if one of the values ​​is the same as the CD specification and the other exceeds the CD specification, it will be high resolution.

However, “96 kHz / 24 bit” and “192 kHz / 24 bit” are the main sources for high resolution audio.

Sponsorship

Over the limits of human hearing! High resolution doesn’t make sense?
What is the limit of the ability to discriminate human sounds?

Although there are individual differences, the human audible range is said to be 20 Hz to 20 kHz.

<Reference: Hearing-Wikipedia>

The sampling frequency of the CD is 44.1 kHz.

In theory, this value can be reproduced up to 22.05 kHz of the original sound, so it can sufficiently cover the human audible range.

In that case, the question arises that high-resolution sound quality, which has higher specs than CDs, may not be audible to the human ear.

Actually, there are many negative opinions from a scientific point of view, and it remains controversial.

<Reference: High Resolution Audio-Wikipedia>

However, the sound is highly dependent on experience, so if you are interested, you should give it a try.

Necessary environment to enjoy high resolution
Whether it makes sense or not, there are a few things you need to prepare for to enjoy high resolution.

The required environment is as follows.

High resolution sound source
High-resolution compatible headphones / earphones / speakers
High resolution compatible terminal
Let’s explain each environment.

High resolution sound source
There are various media for high resolution audio sources.

The easiest of these is probably the Hi-Res Audio source that is delivered online.

If you are a high resolution distribution site, you can get many sources of sound.

Note that listening with high-resolution headphones will not result in high-resolution audio.

High-resolution compatible headphones / earphones / speakers
In addition to high-resolution audio sources, prepare items such as compatible headphones and earphones.

It is quick to check if there is a high resolution mark on the product package to see if it is compatible.

Please note that most wireless headphones do not support high resolution playback because they compress data during transmission.

In the case of wireless technology, only aptX / aptX HD compatible items or SONY LDAC compatible devices support high resolution.

In any case, the high resolution brand is a milestone.

High resolution compatible terminal
In the case of the iPhone, it does not support the output of high-resolution sound sources.

Therefore, it is necessary to prepare a headphone amplifier equipped with a DAC that supports high resolution.

In the case of Android, there are terminals that support high resolution such as Xperia.

To enjoy high-resolution sound quality, you need to check whether the terminal that plays music is also compatible.

Compare the difference between bit, khz and kbps! High resolution doesn’t make sense?

Compare the difference between bit, khz and kbps! High resolution doesn’t make sense?

High-resolution audio

Sound quality comparison!

high resolution audio

It is quick to judge whether the sound quality is good or bad from the data.

However, there are several factors that make up sound quality.

Therefore, in this article, I explained the sound quality in a rather broken way.

If you are a little interested in sound quality, check it out.

Difference between bit, kHz (kilohertz) and kbps (kilobby PS)
What is a bit?
What is kHz (kilohertz)?
What is kbps?
High-resolution sound quality and CD comparison
Over the limits of human hearing! High resolution doesn’t make sense?

Necessary environment to enjoy high resolution
High resolution sound source
High-resolution compatible headphones / earphones / speakers
High resolution compatible terminal
High resolution recommended elements
ACTIVE “CT10”
Difference between analog data and digital data
Difference between lossless compression (lossless compression) and lossy compression (lossy compression)
Lossless compression (lossless compression)
Lossy compression (lossy compression)
About the uncompressed sound source
Difference between bit, kHz (kilohertz) and kbps (kilobby PS)
The next three units are important for measuring sound quality.

little
kHz (kilohertz)
kbps
Let’s briefly explain each unit.

What is a bit?
bit is the number of quantization bits.

Here, it is easy to understand if you think of it as “the resolution (fineness) of the sound itself”.

The higher the value of this bit, the smaller and finer the sound can be reproduced.

In other words, it is more faithful to the original sound.

However, there is a disadvantage that the amount of data increases when the bit is large.

What is kHz (kilohertz)?
kHz is the sampling frequency.

It’s easy to understand if you think of it as “the number of data used in the expression of sound per second”.

The higher this number, the greater the range that can be recorded.

Also, kHz is one of the numbers often used to express headphone specifications.

If you look at the specification table, you will often see numbers like “20Hz to 20kHz”.

This indicates the range of supported ranges.

The lower the number on the left, the better the bass can be heard, and the higher the number on the right, the greater the playback range.

What is kbps?
kbps is the so-called bit rate.

Also known as “bits per second” or “kilobits per second”.

Unit that expresses how many kilobits of data can be transmitted per second.

Kbps can be calculated using the following formula.

kbps = bit x kHz x number of channels

The number of channels is the number of speakers, for example, in stereo, it is “2”.

In theory, the higher the number of processed bits per second, the higher the sound quality.

Sponsorship

High-resolution sound quality and CD comparison
Let’s compare CD and high resolution sound quality from a data point of view.

little kHz kbps
16 bit CD 44.1-48 kHz 1,411.2 kbps
High resolution Exceeds 44.1 kHz / 16 bit
Those that exceed CD specifications are defined as high resolution.

Specific examples are as follows.

44.1 kHz / 16-bit: CD specifications
48 kHz / 16-bit: CD specifications
44.1 kHz / 24 bit: high resolution (the number of quantization bits is greater than the CD specification)
48 kHz / 24 bit: high resolution (the number of quantization bits is greater than the CD specification)
96 kHz / 16 bit: high resolution (sampling frequency is higher than CD specification)
96 kHz / 24-bit: high resolution (both higher than CD specs)
96 kHz / 12 bit: not high resolution (low number of quantization bits)
32 kHz / 24 bit: not high resolution (sample rate is low)

Why isn’t “high resolution audio” worth promising higher quality than CD?

In recent years, Neil Young has been the most outspoken advocate of “high resolution audio” or HRA. These are huge audio files that in theory sound much better than any other digital file. To put this sound in everyone’s hands and ears, he created the PonoPlayer, a portable device that promises the highest fidelity.

He is not alone. Last week at CES, Sony announced a series of new products with high-resolution audio. The main one: an absurdly expensive $ 1,200 Walkman, with hardware that supposedly optimizes the playback of songs recorded on it.

PonoPlayer

At the most basic level, the desire for high-resolution audio is based on reality. We sacrifice audio quality for convenience by adopting digital formats like MP3 and lossy encoding from streaming services like Spotify. A music lover should be concerned with improving audio quality using better files.

This is fair! But from there, the arguments for high-resolution audio crumble.

There are no scientific bases

Although the term “high-resolution audio” is freely used, it generally refers to music that has been digitally encoded at a high sampling rate and bit depth. Specifically, we are talking about higher rates than the CD-quality digital standard, adopted for decades.

Below is a Pono chart that describes various levels of audio quality. At the bottom, we have lower quality files for streaming; in between, we have the CD-quality 44.1 kHz / 16-bit standard; And on top, we have absurdly high resolution files that are 192 kHz / 24 bit encoded.

 

High Resolution Audio

The logic behind HRA is that by maximizing the sample rate and bit depth, you also maximize the sound detail and dynamic range of the music you are listening to. This sounds great in theory, but in practice it is an absolute fantasy.

The CD quality standard, which is insufficient for the Young and HRA defenders, has not been adopted at random. It is not a number taken from the air. It is based on sampling theory and the real limits of human hearing. For the human ear, audio above 44.1 kHz / 16 bit does not show an audible difference.

Still, this does not prevent people from claiming that they can hear the difference in the highest quality audio. The “proof” that PonoPlayer is superior begins with a testimonial video, posted on Pono’s Kickstarter page. Young used his connections to the music industry to fill the PonoPlayer with high definition audio tracks and bring it to famous musicians. They, of course, say they got goosebumps and say that Pono is the best they have ever heard.

This proves nothing. I am not calling Norah Jones and Dave Grohl liars, but I am saying that they are succumbing to confirmation bias, that natural urge to see what you want to see, or hear what you want to hear. If Neil Young pushes a device into his hands and says, “Listen to this, man, you won’t believe it,” you will probably hear exactly what Neil Young wants you to hear.

There is a scientific way to overcome confirmation bias, called a double-blind test, in which two alternatives are presented at random, so you have no idea which is which. There are some issues with the double-blind test, but it’s generally accepted as a good practice, especially when it comes to evaluating something as elusive as the audio quality.

Young and Pono do not cite studies of this type on the benefits of high audio rates or their music player. But there were those who investigated this problem: in a study published in 2007 in the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Brad Meyer and David Moran did a double-blind test with a large sample of “serious” listeners. In it, the 44.1 kHz audio was compared to “the best high-resolution discs we could find.” The goal was not to show which one was better, but to find out if you could tell the difference.

“None of these variables showed a correlation with the results, and there was no difference between the responses and the results of tossing a coin,” they write in the conclusion. I mean, people couldn’t figure out what the high-resolution audio was and what the CD-quality audio was.

In general, expensive hardware is unnecessary for music to sound good, especially if it promises a quality that human ears cannot perceive.

Neil Young even upholds a commendable principle: We should be listening to higher quality music, but high-resolution audio promises more than it has to offer.

HIGH RESOLUTION AUDIO: HOW TO LISTEN TO MUSIC WITH THE HIGHEST QUALITY

Many of our clients, simple music fans or professionals in the sector, constantly seek perfection. Some are willing to spend even thousands of euros to assemble a high-quality hi-fi system. Many come to us for advice, and we are happy to accommodate them. First, however, it is good to gain some (really few) insights into the world of music and the media through which we generally hear it.

Sony High-Resolution Audio

We will start from the beginning.

Digital music is distributed in many formats. Some are compressed, others are not compressed. However, all files are nothing more than a sequence of bits whose value can be 1 or 0. These bits are grouped into bytes, that is, words of 8 bits each. A series of bytes forms a file or an audio track that we can listen to.

High resolution audio: recording and playback

Once recorded, to be played by us, this digital music file is sent to an analog-to-digital converter (DAC), converted to an analog signal, and finally sent to an output circuit, either a preamplifier or analog output

The quality of the file to be reproduced is given by two factors: resolution and sampling frequency.
Resolution is expressed in bits, while the sampling value is expressed in kilohertz (kHz).

Word length (bit)
= resolution Dynamic range Reproducible tones
12 bit 72 dB 4,096
16 bit (CD) 96 dB 65,536
24-bit (DVD) 144 dB 16,777,216
32 bit 192 dB 4,294,967,296

In simple terms, all this means that the denser the digital information, the closer the “digital” version of the signal gets closer to the original analog signal.

“The highest possible quality is the closest to the original as it was produced.”

For example, if you have digital music on CD in 16 bit / 44.1 kHz, this corresponds to a dynamic range of 96 dB with 65,536 gradations. However, music is rarely written to CD under these conditions, because the recording was originally made in only 16 bits (other recording defects may further reduce the signal).

Today, however, recordings are made at 24-bit / 192 kHz (in part also at 32-bit / 384 kHz), which means that the length of the information is significantly longer (and therefore has a greater dynamic range) and a higher sampling rate thus increasing the bandwidth.

The higher the resolution of the audio file, the higher the sample rate and the better the final audio signal.

Please note that the increase in “information content” resulting from higher resolution / sampling is exponential: consequently, the qualitative difference between a 16-bit audio file and 24-bit recordings could be so subtle that only be perceived by a trained ear and obviously well equipped.

HIGH DEFINITION: COMPRESSED AUDIO FORMATS AND UNCOMPRESSED AUDIO FORMATS

Audio files can be compressed (with or without loss of quality) and uncompressed (without loss of quality).

Some examples:

Uncompressed audio formats

WAV – Waveform Audio File Format (.wav)
AIFF – Audio Interchange File Form (.aiff, .aif or .aifc)

Compressed audio formats (no quality loss)

ALAC: Apple Lossless Audio Codec (.mp4 or .m4a)
FLAC: Lossless Audio Codec (.flac)

Compressed audio formats (with loss of quality)

MP3: MPEG-1 or MPEG-2 Audio Layer III (.mp3)
AAC: Advanced Audio Coding (.aac, .mp4, or .m4a)

To make a “visual” example and clarify the concept, let’s take a photograph: on the left, the original version, in good resolution; On the right, the same photo, saved in compressed format, which reduces its quality:

high rsolution audio

music in high definition, example of maximum quality

In summary: CDs (compact discs) offered good quality (not maximum) and a certain “portability”, but their capacity was limited.
Mp3 files certainly helped share music over the network, at the price of a substantial loss in terms of playback quality.

HIGH DEFINITION SOUND: A SMALL GLOSSARY TO BETTER UNDERSTAND

Bit rate

The bit rate is the amount of data per second required for a transfer from A to B. The bit rate is always expressed in kilobits (Kbps) or megabits (Mbps) per second. For example, an mp3 plays an audio track from 96 to 320 kbps; a FLAC file can exceed 5000 kbps.

Bit depth (resolution)

This value describes the number of bits recorded in a single audio sample. Therefore, it is equivalent to termination. An example: the quality of a CD (compact disc) supports up to 16 bits; An audio DVD supports up to 24 bits.

What is high-resolution audio?

High Red Audio

With more accurate analog sound sampling, this technology promises better digital sound than traditional audio CDs.
Marketing requires manufacturers not to miss the opportunity to put beautiful acronyms on their devices to indicate the presence of new “revolutionary” technologies. Therefore, in recent months, some headphones and speakers have blossomed, especially the labels “HD audio” or “high-resolution audio”. What does “high resolution audio” (or high definition) mean? In particular, it is a digital sound of at least 24 bits / 96 kHz, so it offers better quality than the 16 bits / 44.1 kHz of the audio CD. If we synthesize too much, we could say that it is a sampling gap similar to that which can separate Blu-ray from DVD.

How is it possible ? To fully understand it, it is important to go back to the beginnings of digital sound. Originally, the sound is analog data, such as the variation in air pressure or an electrical signal over time. To digitize the sound, samples are regularly taken and encoded in a series of bits. When creating the audio CD, manufacturers agreed on 16-bit encoding and sampling at 44.1 kHz, or 44,100 times per second. Therefore, one minute of mono sound requires about 5.3 MB of data and 10.6 MB of stereo per minute. When the first audio CDs were released in 1984/85, vinyl fans cried as a betrayal, accusing the digital sound of not reproducing the warmth of analog sound from the former 33rpm.

Is there really a difference?

We had the opportunity to test the entire high-resolution audio system multiple times: 192 Hz FLAC audio files, on a NWZ-A compatible high-resolution player and MDR-1A headphones, also Hi-Res. The reproduction is of course very good by ear and it seems that the songs on our test album (Play MemoriesDaft Punk) have been given precision. Even when the volume is pushed to the limit of the maximum threshold, the reproduction is still excellent and well detailed. But we also listened to the same MP3 album, in a (relatively) high 320 kbit / s sample, even with Sony’s portable music player and high-resolution headphones. And it is clear that the difference was frankly not clear. Our perception of representation was just as good. We continue the experience by listening to the MP3 version of the Daft Punk album, this time with less high-quality headphones than the Sony MDR-1A. And there the register was even worse: muted, less accurate in the treble and less powerful in the bass. Result: By ear sampling of the file had less influence on the reproduction because the quality of the products used to reproduce the sound, ie the player and the headphones. So a question about everything from a material order. For the right choice, go to our helmet department and our two specific comparisons:

– Comparison of headphones for less than 100 euros
– Comparison of headphones for more than 100 euros