The relationship between frequency, bit rate and sound quality of MP3 Part 3
The third parameter is the most important, which is the bit rate.
Choosing it directly affects the size and listening experience of your mp3 file. The higher the compression ratio, the higher the distortion, and the lower the compression ratio, the lower the distortion, but how do we find one for ourselves? What is the acceptable balance between the two? This requires careful exploration in the experiment. Considering that the sound quality of low bitrate files is not suitable for playing music, the minimum set is 128kbps, and four fixed bitrate files of 128, 192, 256 and 320 are used for comparison. and try.
The compression ratio of 128 kbps is still relatively rough, and the high-frequency part is highly distorted after compression. It sounds hollow, wrinkled, rough, and there are often flickering sounds. Misunderstanding, the compressed volume of a 3 minute 39 piece of music is 3414kb, although the volume is not large, the sound is not satisfactory, and there is a relatively large flaw.
192kbps bit rate compression effect is much better than 128. First of all, the sound is solid, at least there is no empty feeling, the high-frequency distortion is also much less, the sound is compact, the noise is small and clean, achieving relatively ideal listening. The sound effect, just because the compression is still relatively strong, the detail performance is still not very good, the texture of musical instruments, especially the wind instruments, it is still very hard, unreal and lacks musicality. The compressed size is 5123kb, and I think the compression ratio is 128~ It is better to use it in a mp3 player with a capacity of ~256m, which can not only satisfy the basic sense of hearing, but also is suitable in size.128m can store about 95 minutes of music, and 256m can double to 190 minutes of music.
The 256 kbps compression rate is naturally a step higher than 192 in terms of sound quality. Take the first 10 seconds of the track, the low frequency of the cello is obviously less grainy, and the sound is more smooth and natural, with texture and texture. It is also clearer, with much more detail, the rendering of the atmosphere is more prominent, the rotation of parts in the following songs is also more expressive, the clarity of large and small signals is also improved, and the sound is more detailed and lasting. But at the same time, the file size has also increased to 6831kb, which is still affordable for a 256m mp3 player. It is not difficult to know by calculation. According to the bit rate of 256, about 135 minutes of music can be stored. Generally speaking, it is enough, 128m is a bit less and can only support a little over an hour, so it is recommended to use 192 bitrate for 128m.
320 kbps is the maximum bitrate that lame can provide. The final file generated is 8592kb which is about 8.4M. Compared to the 37M of the wav file the compression ratio is basically 4.5:1 but the generated mp3 file sounds very distorted Now on Compared to other 320 bit rates, the natural advantage is obvious, the tone, details, etc. they are very delicate, basically the sound quality of the original copy of the CD is achieved, especially in the CD player with the mp3. playback function, sounds basically No difference, but I use relatively high-end earplugs with high resolution, plus my experience and skill with music and equipment, I can still hear a lot of differences compared to wav files, in first place; Compressed mp3 sounds a bit The crunch feel is relatively dry overall. Without the wav file, it sounds fresh and dynamic. In terms of final details, nuances and sense of space, the separation is not as high as the quality of the wav file, but it is quite close in terms of timbre, but the performance is poor and the digital flavor is relatively strong. So if you are using a miniature hard disk player like an iPod, I recommend that you use a compression ratio of 320kbps, which can get the best listening experience. Of course, listening to wav directly is the best~~ No compression, lossless, but unfortunately there are no Walkman that support lossless compression like Ape, otherwise you can choose from a variety of options.
The above is the fixed code rate compression ratio.
