![\"HIRES\"](\"https:\/\/i.ytimg.com\/vi\/jjBfWJgPCQ4\/hqdefault.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Is not it possible to feel the difference in format (difference between CD and high resolution) purely by sound?<\/p>\n
![\"Hi-Res\"](\"https:\/\/www.soundandvision.com\/images\/styles\/600_wide\/public\/hifi-hires.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
As explained above, the “suspicion that sound content in each format is different” can not dissipate from the music files sold.
\n(It should be the same, but it is difficult to identify unless indicated explicitly).<\/p>\n
In that case, I have no choice but to record it and touch it myself.
\nIf you record the same sound source in different formats and play it, you can see if you may feel that the sound is different depending on the format.
\nThe important thing is to record the same sound source in different formats with the same configuration of the equipment.
\n(Do not convert the recorded file to a different format).<\/p>\n
However, even with this method, it is possible that you are listening to the habits of the equipment, not the format difference, so you should be careful, you must compare several recording equipment in the same way to extract points in common.<\/p>\n
Teams that can be recorded at home are the UA-3FX (~ 48kHz \/ 24bit) and the FA-66 (~ 192KHz \/ 24bit).<\/p>\n
Since there is only one for each, it is not possible to record the same sound source in several formats at the same time.
\nThen we must do. ..<\/p>\n
That’s it! We are going to bend an analog disc! (Hahaha)<\/p>\n
In modern terms, it is a digital file of analog records. .. (Smile bitter)
\nIf you record an analog disk with the same configuration but with different sampling frequencies and bits depths, you can achieve “almost the same sound source”, “same device settings” and “different formats”, so I tried it.
\nI mean, half of the reason why I bought a used FA-66 was “dubbing disc”, so I experienced it a long time ago. (Hahaha)<\/p>\n
From this moment, we are in the world of
\n“Individual opinions”,
\n“There are individual differences in how we feel the effects” and
\n“Compared to our company”
\n.
\n(Given that we have not confirmed the similarity between several devices, half-talks).<\/p>\n
I certainly felt the difference in sound when I changed the sampling frequency, but I felt the difference when I changed the depth of bits was greater than that.
\nExpressed in words, increasing the sampling frequency made it feel smooth and courteous, and lower it made it sound more vigorous and dense.
\nThe depth of 24-bit bits is more realistic and I felt that the feeling of location and space became clearer.<\/p>\n
By the way, when folding analog discs, I feel that I prefer 48 kHz \/ 24 bits to the highest specification of 192 kHz \/ 24 bits.
\nTherefore, at present, in the analog record file (for playback purposes in NW players, etc.), the recording is made at 48 kHz \/ 24 bits, and the level is not altered and saved only by adjusting the Input \/ output reading.
\nIn order to move to a CD, it is recorded at 44.1 kHz \/ 24 bits and, after adjusting the level, etc., it becomes 16 bits.<\/p>\n
In any case, the taste is different from the feeling of “oh! Weird” that you feel when you change from the CD version of the same song on sale to the high resolution version, and the difference is very small.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"