![\"HiRes\"](\"https:\/\/www.audiotec-fischer.de\/media\/image\/45\/de\/d8\/atf_hi-res-audio_800x800.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Differences that can be heard and understood, differences that can not be understood.<\/p>\n
![\"What](\"https:\/\/www.trustedreviews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/54\/2018\/09\/Hi-res-Audio.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Recently, the same song will be launched in multiple media \/ formats as “CD”, “MP3 \/ AAC”, “44.1KHz \/ 16bit FLAC \/ WAV”, “high resolution compression format”, “FLAC \/ WAV high resolution” , and “DSD”. It is increasing, some of them are published on analog discs.<\/p>\n
I am happy to have more options to enjoy music, but sometimes I see and listen to topics such as “the alleged superiority or inferiority of sound quality” and “high resolution sound is better”.
\nWell, manufacturers are also working hard to promote the “high resolution”, so I think that somehow is grown the image of “high resolution = good sound”.<\/p>\n
By the way, do you feel the difference in the format of the same song, especially the difference in the sound between the CD version and the high resolution version, once you leave aside the good and the bad?<\/p>\n
Even if it converts linear PCM music of 44.1 kHz \/ 16 bits, which is a CD format, a compression with loss that can not be played at 20 kHz, such as MP3 and AAC, even if you have a certain bit rate, You can change to AB. It is known that people can not distinguish between high resolution and CD, which has only the presence or absence of performance outside the limit of human perception in the first place is it easy to distinguish between high resolution and CD?
\nIt is a simple and simple question.<\/p>\n
Instead, in the songs that are effectively sold in normal version and in high resolution version, the sound difference is usually reviewed.
\nWhat’s wrong with this? ..<\/p>\n
To unravel this, first we have to change our perspective.<\/p>\n
For example, suppose you have a song whose MP3 \/ AAC version, CD version, high resolution version and disk version are on sale.
\nIs the same sound recorded in each file in the first place?<\/p>\n
I am sure that some of you come with a pinch, but the keyword is to dominate.<\/p>\n
Originally, it meant optimizing the original master of two tracks that was completed in the production process in the cutting process to make a disc. Specifically, keeping the signal within the physical limits of the disc, we will adjust
\nThe level, the equalizer, the filter, etc. So that when the disc finally produced is reproduced, the sound is as similar as possible to the original master’s degree. . . In the digital age, compressed files, high resolution files and destination means have been added and changed, but the essence of mastering, which is the adjustment process to optimize destination, has not changed . It is not just about format conversion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"