![\"Digital](\"https:\/\/mixbutton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/DAW-1-small.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Not necessarily bad.<\/p>\n
![\"Digital](\"https:\/\/previews.123rf.com\/images\/princeoflove\/princeoflove1712\/princeoflove171200022\/92188621-digital-audio-mixer-in-recording-editing-broadcasting-studio-shallow-dept-of-field-music-background.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
… With this flow, it seems like a story like “Don’t be fooled by such prejudice!” .<\/p>\n
However, since music is something that humans enjoy, I think there is no problem for people to “enjoy” music in the end.<\/p>\n
… However, at least on the side of “playing” music, I would like to have other criteria of judgment based on the knowledge of this area.<\/p>\n
A point of view that can be used as a standard for “good sound”.
\nSo what are the views that can be used as a standard for “good sound”?<\/p>\n
These are some of the things I can think of.<\/p>\n
Rich tones<\/p>\n
(The piano sound is seen with a spectrum analyzer. You can see multiple harmonics (thin parts of the mountain))
\n“Intonations” and is, when a sound sounded, the sound that comes out in resonance-assistant is.<\/p>\n
All the “sounds” that exist in nature, including the sounds of musical instruments, are “sounds that are a mixture of various sounds.”<\/p>\n
* Click here for more details \u2193<\/p>\n
Full comment! What is “harmonic”? ?? [Basics of music and music theory learned from scratch]
\nWhatever “how you relate to music”, like playing an instrument, composing or editing the voice, it is useful … but I will explain the “nuances” that are often overlooked in an easy to understand way.<\/p>\n
khufrudamonotes.com
\n2020.03.02<\/p>\n
Harmonics, Words and Body Culture Magazine<\/p>\n
See on Amazon
\nView at Rakuten Ichiba
\nSee on Yahoo! shopping<\/p>\n
Sound quality is judged by the way this “overtone” sounds.<\/p>\n
Compared to the same type of musical instrument, the “harmonic” sound that balances the shape of the sound and,
\n“Harmonic” is a sound that sounded a lot I think in many cases it is evaluated that it is “good sound” it will.<\/p>\n
Frequency band balance
\nThe human audible range is said to be 20Hz to 20000Hz, and the
\nMusic is basically made using sounds in this range.<\/p>\n
Especially when judging the sound quality of a song, I feel like a song that sounds well balanced is often said to sound good in
\nrather than one whose sound is skewed towards a specific area.<\/p>\n
Of course, it depends on the genre and arrangement, so this is not always the case.
\nHowever, I basically judge the sound quality based on this standard when mixing.<\/p>\n
S \/ N ratio
\nSignal-to-noise ratio and is, “Signal (signal) and noise is the ratio of (noise).”<\/p>\n
When you turn up the volume of quiet music, do you sometimes hear the noise “Sir —“?<\/p>\n
Basically that sound is a sound (noise) that is not originally necessary for music, isn’t it?<\/p>\n
In other words, it appears that the one with the lowest possible noise component is considered “good sound”.<\/p>\n
dynamic
\nI think that the dynamics mentioned earlier in the sound pressure war theme is also an element related to “good sound”.<\/p>\n
A sound source that naturally hears the difference in volume between low and loud sounds in a song can be said to be a “better sound” than sound unnaturally compressed by the maximizer.<\/p>\n
For example, in the performance of the orchestra
\n“the flute section is playing a person and the volume of the”,
\n“the whole orchestra section is playing the volume of”
\nIsn’t it funny as a musical expression that you were the same?<\/p>\n
Due to the strong (dynamic) volume difference, performance will be sharpened.<\/p>\n
However, some “rock and hard music has evolved from the direction of narrowing the dynamics, like” distorting the guitar “and giving it more power, so that the narrower the final dynamic, the more powerful it will be.” Some people seem to think.<\/p>\n
However, now that loudness normalization is applied to all distribution platforms, I believe that “even rock and loud music must be mixed and mastered to ensure sufficient dynamics.”<\/p>\n
This is because, “for each of the compression of the instrument part as a sound creation and”, “squash the dynamics of the entire sound source of the Morotomo sound completely different implications” does not appear to be a representation musically significant because.<\/p>\n
If the sound pressure is adjusted to an appropriate level, the volume cannot be lowered from the platform side and dynamics can be ensured.<\/p>\n
I think this video will be helpful too.<\/p>\n
Consistency with trends<\/p>\n
The sound arrangements also have trends of the time.<\/p>\n
For example, many ’80s pop songs have a fairly deep reverb on the drums.<\/p>\n
However, these songs are rarely seen these days.<\/p>\n
Also, in recent years, a method called a subwoofer that mixes ultra-low-frequency sounds has become popular, producing b<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"